Ad is loading...
GPOW vs MLPB
GPOW vs MLPB Comparison
Open Charts GPOW vs MLPB
GPOW vs MLPB Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GPOW vs. MLPB commentary
Feb 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPOW is a Buy and MLPB is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPB has more net assets: 244M vs. GPOW (10.9M). MLPB has a higher annual dividend yield than GPOW: MLPB (12.769) vs GPOW (2.052). GPOW was incepted earlier than MLPB: GPOW (2 years) vs MLPB (9 years).
| GPOW | MLPB | GPOW / MLPB | |
| Gain YTD | 2.052 | 12.769 | 16% |
| Net Assets | 10.9M | 244M | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | N/A | N/A | - |
| Yield | N/A | 5.87 | - |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 9 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
GPOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPOW has been closely correlated with OKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GPOW jumps, then OKE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GPOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPOW | 100% | N/A | ||
| OKE - GPOW | 70% Closely correlated | -0.57% | ||
| WMB - GPOW | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| TRGP - GPOW | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.66% | ||
| KMI - GPOW | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.12% | ||
| PAGP - GPOW | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.51% | ||
More | ||||
MLPB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLPB has been closely correlated with ET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MLPB jumps, then ET could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MLPB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLPB | 100% | +0.28% | ||
| ET - MLPB | 77% Closely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| ENLC - MLPB | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NGL - MLPB | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.20% | ||
| GEL - MLPB | 0% Poorly correlated | +1.06% | ||
| CQP - MLPB | -1% Poorly correlated | +3.36% | ||
More | ||||