GPTGF
Price
$2.87
Change
-$0.28 (-8.89%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
NTSGF
Price
$1.50
Change
-$0.02 (-1.32%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
Ad is loading...

GPTGF vs NTSGF

Header iconGPTGF vs NTSGF Comparison
Open Charts GPTGF vs NTSGFBanner chart's image
GPT Group
Price$2.87
Change-$0.28 (-8.89%)
Volume$5.72K
CapitalizationN/A
NATIONAL STORAGE REIT
Price$1.50
Change-$0.02 (-1.32%)
Volume$4.36K
CapitalizationN/A
GPTGF vs NTSGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GPTGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTSGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GPTGF vs. NTSGF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPTGF is a Buy and NTSGF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (GPTGF: $2.87 vs. NTSGF: $1.50)
Brand notoriety: GPTGF and NTSGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GPTGF: 7% vs. NTSGF: 459%
Market capitalization -- GPTGF: $5.54B vs. NTSGF: $6.14B
GPTGF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $5.54B. NTSGF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $6.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GPTGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNTSGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GPTGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NTSGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GPTGF is a better buy in the long-term than NTSGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GPTGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTSGF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GPTGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NTSGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GPTGF is a better buy in the short-term than NTSGF.

Price Growth

GPTGF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NTSGF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -13.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -3.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.90%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-3.10% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTSGF($6.14B) has a higher market cap than GPTGF($5.54B). GPTGF has higher P/E ratio than NTSGF: GPTGF (17.27) vs NTSGF (3.43). GPTGF YTD gains are higher at: -6.678 vs. NTSGF (-8.788). GPTGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 621M vs. NTSGF (579M). NTSGF has more cash in the bank: 83.7M vs. GPTGF (60.2M). NTSGF has less debt than GPTGF: NTSGF (1.08B) vs GPTGF (5.1B). GPTGF has higher revenues than NTSGF: GPTGF (802M) vs NTSGF (299M).
GPTGFNTSGFGPTGF / NTSGF
Capitalization5.54B6.14B90%
EBITDA621M579M107%
Gain YTD-6.678-8.78876%
P/E Ratio17.273.43503%
Revenue802M299M268%
Total Cash60.2M83.7M72%
Total Debt5.1B1.08B472%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GPTGF: Fundamental Ratings
GPTGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
96
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GPTGFNTSGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
18%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
27%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
57%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
22%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GPTGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTSGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGYPX15.72N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Focused Value P
HICVX20.70-0.48
-2.27%
Hennessy Cornerstone Value Inst
OANIX24.73-0.67
-2.64%
Oakmark International Institutional
TIOIX14.78-0.42
-2.76%
Nuveen International Opps R6
PLAAX15.43-0.54
-3.38%
PACE Large Co Growth Equity A

GPTGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GPTGF and NTSGF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GPTGF and NTSGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPTGF
1D Price
Change %
GPTGF100%
N/A
NTSGF - GPTGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INGEF - GPTGF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IIPZF - GPTGF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KLPEF - GPTGF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GECFF - GPTGF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NTSGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTSGF has been loosely correlated with FRZCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NTSGF jumps, then FRZCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTSGF
1D Price
Change %
NTSGF100%
N/A
FRZCF - NTSGF
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
STKAF - NTSGF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PRKWF - NTSGF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NRWRF - NTSGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPTGF - NTSGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More