Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GQSCX vs NAESX
GQSCX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts GQSCX vs NAESX
GQSCX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GQSCX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GQSCX is a Hold and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 177B vs. GQSCX (3.56M). NAESX pays higher dividends than GQSCX: NAESX (1.08) vs GQSCX (0.33). GQSCX was incepted earlier than NAESX: GQSCX (9 years) vs NAESX (66 years). GQSCX (3.77) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). GQSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). GQSCX (0) and NAESX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GQSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.15 vs. NAESX (28.95). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 33.38 vs. GQSCX (22.90).
| GQSCX | NAESX | GQSCX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.17 | 500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.77 | 0.17 | 2,218% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.639 | 13.680 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.56M | 177B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 1.08 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.15 | 28.95 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.91 | 54.86 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.90 | 33.38 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 160.50 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement