GRAF
Price
$10.49
Change
+$0.04 (+0.38%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
305.34M
SBHGF
Price
$32.02
Change
+$0.41 (+1.30%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
9.3B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRAF vs SBHGF

Header iconGRAF vs SBHGF Comparison
Open Charts GRAF vs SBHGFBanner chart's image
Graf Global
Price$10.49
Change+$0.04 (+0.38%)
Volume$516
Capitalization305.34M
SBI Holdings
Price$32.02
Change+$0.41 (+1.30%)
Volume$125
Capitalization9.3B
GRAF vs SBHGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRAF vs. SBHGF commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRAF is a StrongBuy and SBHGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (GRAF: $10.49 vs. SBHGF: $32.02)
Brand notoriety: GRAF and SBHGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRAF: 1% vs. SBHGF: 8%
Market capitalization -- GRAF: $305.34M vs. SBHGF: $9.3B
GRAF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $305.34M. SBHGF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $9.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSBHGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GRAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SBHGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBHGF is a better buy in the long-term than GRAF.

Price Growth

GRAF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.49% price change this week, while SBHGF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -2.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

GRAF is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.01% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBHGF($9.3B) has a higher market cap than GRAF($305M). GRAF has higher P/E ratio than SBHGF: GRAF (115.54) vs SBHGF (9.01). SBHGF YTD gains are higher at: 28.428 vs. GRAF (3.964). SBHGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 235B vs. GRAF (-1.18M). SBHGF has more cash in the bank: 4.87T vs. GRAF (383K). GRAF has less debt than SBHGF: GRAF (0) vs SBHGF (5.12T). SBHGF has higher revenues than GRAF: SBHGF (1.31T) vs GRAF (0).
GRAFSBHGFGRAF / SBHGF
Capitalization305M9.3B3%
EBITDA-1.18M235B-0%
Gain YTD3.96428.42814%
P/E Ratio115.549.011,283%
Revenue01.31T-
Total Cash383K4.87T0%
Total Debt05.12T-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SBHGF: Fundamental Ratings
SBHGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
49
SMR RATING
1..100
54
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
89
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LSPCX5.53-0.01
-0.18%
LoCorr Spectrum Income C
GEIZX16.57-0.21
-1.25%
GuideStone Funds Growth Equity Index Inv
JRACX74.43-1.13
-1.50%
Janus Henderson Research C
NDVRX15.61-0.28
-1.76%
MFS New Discovery Value R1
MWOJX62.76-1.13
-1.77%
MFS Global Growth R4

GRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRAF and EMCGU have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRAF and EMCGU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRAF
1D Price
Change %
GRAF100%
+0.38%
EMCGU - GRAF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRHC - GRAF
7%
Poorly correlated
-3.46%
GIGGU - GRAF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
VOYA - GRAF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.51%
SBHGF - GRAF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
More

SBHGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBHGF and TBMC have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBHGF and TBMC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBHGF
1D Price
Change %
SBHGF100%
+1.27%
TBMC - SBHGF
19%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
ISRL - SBHGF
17%
Poorly correlated
+7.28%
NETD - SBHGF
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
GIGGU - SBHGF
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
MSSAF - SBHGF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More