GRFS
Price
$10.72
Change
-$0.06 (-0.56%)
Updated
Aug 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.48B
94 days until earnings call
STAA
Price
$18.48
Change
+$0.72 (+4.05%)
Updated
Aug 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.91B
One day until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRFS vs STAA

Header iconGRFS vs STAA Comparison
Open Charts GRFS vs STAABanner chart's image
Grifols SA
Price$10.72
Change-$0.06 (-0.56%)
Volume$33.9K
Capitalization5.48B
STAAR Surgical
Price$18.48
Change+$0.72 (+4.05%)
Volume$40.78K
Capitalization1.91B
GRFS vs STAA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GRFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STAA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRFS vs. STAA commentary
Aug 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRFS is a Hold and STAA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 05, 2025
Stock price -- (GRFS: $10.72 vs. STAA: $18.49)
Brand notoriety: GRFS and STAA are both not notable
GRFS represents the Pharmaceuticals: Major, while STAA is part of the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRFS: 58% vs. STAA: 158%
Market capitalization -- GRFS: $5.48B vs. STAA: $1.91B
GRFS [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] is valued at $5.48B. STAA’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $1.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry ranges from $739.66B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry is $86.34B. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $8.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTAA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GRFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STAA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRFS is a better buy in the long-term than STAA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STAA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GRFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • STAA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both GRFS and STAA are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

GRFS (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а +6.24% price change this week, while STAA (@Medical Specialties) price change was -3.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was +0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.21%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was -1.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

GRFS is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

STAA is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Major (+0.39% weekly)

The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.

@Medical Specialties (-1.12% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRFS($5.48B) has a higher market cap than STAA($1.91B). STAA has higher P/E ratio than GRFS: STAA (90.79) vs GRFS (68.68). GRFS YTD gains are higher at: 44.892 vs. STAA (-23.878). GRFS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 640M vs. STAA (33.2M). GRFS has more cash in the bank: 544M vs. STAA (221M). STAA has less debt than GRFS: STAA (35.8M) vs GRFS (11.1B). GRFS has higher revenues than STAA: GRFS (6.54B) vs STAA (322M).
GRFSSTAAGRFS / STAA
Capitalization5.48B1.91B287%
EBITDA640M33.2M1,928%
Gain YTD44.892-23.878-188%
P/E Ratio68.6890.7976%
Revenue6.54B322M2,030%
Total Cash544M221M246%
Total Debt11.1B35.8M31,006%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GRFS vs STAA: Fundamental Ratings
GRFS
STAA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8294
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3864
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8188
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GRFS's Valuation (6) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is significantly better than the same rating for STAA (83) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that GRFS’s stock grew significantly faster than STAA’s over the last 12 months.

GRFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as STAA (100) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that GRFS’s stock grew similarly to STAA’s over the last 12 months.

GRFS's SMR Rating (82) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as STAA (94) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that GRFS’s stock grew similarly to STAA’s over the last 12 months.

GRFS's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as STAA (64) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that GRFS’s stock grew similarly to STAA’s over the last 12 months.

GRFS's P/E Growth Rating (81) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as STAA (88) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that GRFS’s stock grew similarly to STAA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRFSSTAA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STAA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VBIAX50.13-0.36
-0.71%
Vanguard Balanced Index Adm
HNMVX26.27-0.32
-1.20%
Harbor Mid Cap Value Retirement
AZBAX22.39-0.31
-1.37%
Virtus Small-Cap A
JLPYX22.79-0.37
-1.60%
JPMorgan US Large Cap Core Plus R6
MAEGX15.25-0.26
-1.68%
BlackRock Unconstrained Equity Instl

GRFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRFS has been closely correlated with GIKLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GRFS jumps, then GIKLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRFS
1D Price
Change %
GRFS100%
+0.75%
GIKLY - GRFS
68%
Closely correlated
N/A
GIFOF - GRFS
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PFE - GRFS
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
BIIB - GRFS
28%
Poorly correlated
+3.09%
GILD - GRFS
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
More