GRID
Price
$196.41
Change
-$0.73 (-0.37%)
Updated
Jun 4, 01:11 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
11.66B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IPAY
Price
$44.47
Change
+$0.99 (+2.28%)
Updated
Jun 4, 01:02 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
159.19M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRID vs IPAY

Header iconGRID vs IPAY Comparison
Open Charts GRID vs IPAYBanner chart's image
GRID vs IPAY Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) vs. Amplify Digital Payments ETF (IPAY)

Key Takeaways

  • GRID offers broader diversification with approximately 120 holdings focused on smart grid infrastructure, while IPAY is more concentrated with around 40 holdings in digital payments companies.
  • GRID's expense ratio of 0.56% is lower than IPAY's 0.75%, providing a cost advantage for long-term investors.
  • GRID emphasizes industrials (65%) and utilities (20%), contrasting IPAY's heavy tilt toward technology (55%) and financial services (41%).
  • Both are passive thematic ETFs, but GRID benefits from infrastructure spending trends, showing stronger performance in recent market cycles.
  • GRID has demonstrated superior relative positioning in recent months amid energy transition demands, while IPAY faces higher volatility from fintech dynamics.
  • Liquidity is robust for both, though GRID's larger scale supports tighter spreads.

Introduction

GRID and IPAY represent distinct thematic strategies in the evolving landscape of technology-driven infrastructure and fintech. While neither competes directly, both appeal to investors seeking exposure to structural shifts: GRID to the modernization of electric grids essential for renewable energy integration, and IPAY to the global surge in digital transactions. Comparing them highlights trade-offs in sector focus, diversification, and cost efficiency. In the current environment of heightened infrastructure investment and accelerating cashless economies, understanding their structural differences aids portfolio positioning for long-term trends like energy transition and payment digitization.

First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) Overview

The First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) is a passive ETF that tracks the NASDAQ OMX Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. This modified free-float market-cap-weighted index targets companies involved in electric grid infrastructure, meters, devices, networks, energy storage, management, and enabling software. It holds approximately 120 stocks, providing diversified global exposure.

Top holdings include ETN (Eaton Corporation plc, ~8.6%), JCI (Johnson Controls International plc, ~7.6%), Schneider Electric S.E. (~7.3%), PWR (Quanta Services, Inc., ~4.8%), and National Grid plc (~7.1%). Sector allocations skew toward industrials (65%), utilities (20%), and technology (11%). The expense ratio is 0.56%. The index reconstitutes semi-annually and rebalances quarterly, classifying holdings as "pure play" (80% weight) or diversified (20% weight).

Amplify Digital Payments ETF (IPAY) Overview

The Amplify Digital Payments ETF (IPAY), formerly ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF, is a passive ETF tracking the Nasdaq CTA Global Digital Payments Index. This market-cap-weighted index focuses on companies in card networks, payment infrastructure, processors, and solutions like digital wallets. It maintains around 40 holdings for targeted exposure to the shift from cash to mobile payments.

Top holdings feature Block, Inc. (~6.2%), V (Visa Inc., ~5.8%), MA (Mastercard Inc., ~5.5%), Adyen NV (~5.5%), Affirm Holdings Inc. (~5.5%), AXP (American Express Co., ~5.4%), and PYPL (PayPal Holdings Inc., ~4.8%). Allocations emphasize technology (55%) and financial services (41%). The expense ratio stands at 0.75%. The index reconstitutes semi-annually and rebalances quarterly.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The smart grid sector underpinning GRID faces catalysts like surging demand for renewable integration, aging infrastructure upgrades, and data center electrification, amid policy support for energy transition. However, cybersecurity vulnerabilities, supply chain constraints, and regulatory hurdles pose risks. Meanwhile, IPAY's digital payments ecosystem benefits from e-commerce growth, real-time payment adoption (e.g., ISO 20022), and digital wallet proliferation, but contends with fraud risks, competition, and economic sensitivity to consumer spending. Macro factors like interest rates and geopolitical tensions influence both, with infrastructure resilience favoring GRID in uncertain cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, GRID has outperformed IPAY, driven by infrastructure rotation and utilities momentum amid energy demands. Year-to-date through early 2026, GRID delivered approximately 29% returns, contrasting IPAY's decline of around 10%, reflecting fintech volatility from rate expectations and spending slowdowns. GRID exhibits lower relative volatility due to its defensive utilities exposure, while IPAY's growth-oriented holdings amplify swings in sector rotations. Over broader cycles, GRID's trend consistency ties to sustained capex in grids, positioning it favorably against IPAY's cyclical fintech profile.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore it today to enhance your ETF comparison and discovery process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors GRID due to its superior diversification, lower expense ratio, structural alignment with infrastructure megatrends, and stronger trend consistency in recent market cycles. While IPAY offers compelling digital economy exposure, GRID's risk-adjusted profile and sector momentum suggest higher probability of outperformance over the next several months.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GRID vs. IPAY commentary
Jun 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRID is a Buy and IPAY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRID has more net assets: 11.7B vs. IPAY (159M). GRID has a higher annual dividend yield than IPAY: GRID (28.910) vs IPAY (-16.445). GRID was incepted earlier than IPAY: GRID (17 years) vs IPAY (11 years). GRID (0.56) has a lower expense ratio than IPAY (0.75). IPAY has a higher turnover GRID (26.00) vs GRID (26.00).
GRIDIPAYGRID / IPAY
Gain YTD28.910-16.445-176%
Net Assets11.7B159M7,358%
Total Expense Ratio0.560.7575%
Turnover26.0029.0090%
Yield0.780.8889%
Fund Existence17 years11 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRIDIPAY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRID
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IPAY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VCIEX10.32N/A
N/A
VALIC Company I International Eqs Idx
FLUIX30.57N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Stk Selec Lg Cp Val I
FCIGX41.55N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth I
GQHIX14.26N/A
N/A
GQG Partners US Quality Value Fund Ins
TGBLX12.57N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Global Impact Equity I

GRID and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRID has been closely correlated with ETN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GRID jumps, then ETN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRID
1D Price
Change %
GRID100%
-0.17%
ETN - GRID
77%
Closely correlated
+0.86%
NVT - GRID
67%
Closely correlated
+1.73%
AEIS - GRID
67%
Closely correlated
+3.27%
PWR - GRID
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
JCI - GRID
65%
Loosely correlated
+3.50%
More

IPAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPAY has been closely correlated with XYZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IPAY jumps, then XYZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IPAY
1D Price
Change %
IPAY100%
-4.17%
XYZ - IPAY
71%
Closely correlated
-5.87%
GPN - IPAY
71%
Closely correlated
-8.35%
TOST - IPAY
68%
Closely correlated
-4.86%
AFRM - IPAY
67%
Closely correlated
-6.68%
ACIW - IPAY
66%
Closely correlated
-4.92%
More