It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GRMN’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHXGBY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GRMN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HXGBY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
GRMN (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а +0.49% price change this week, while HXGBY (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was -12.30% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was -3.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.43%.
GRMN is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.
HXGBY is expected to report earnings on Feb 01, 2025.
This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.
GRMN | HXGBY | GRMN / HXGBY | |
Capitalization | 28.5B | 26B | 110% |
EBITDA | 1.27B | 1.39B | 91% |
Gain YTD | 66.717 | -27.243 | -245% |
P/E Ratio | 21.96 | 22.03 | 100% |
Revenue | 5.23B | 5.37B | 97% |
Total Cash | 1.97B | 505M | 390% |
Total Debt | 113M | 4.32B | 3% |
GRMN | HXGBY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 19 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 75 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | 69 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 81 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HXGBY's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as GRMN (25) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that HXGBY’s stock grew similarly to GRMN’s over the last 12 months.
GRMN's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HXGBY (75) in the null industry. This means that GRMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than HXGBY’s over the last 12 months.
GRMN's SMR Rating (42) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as HXGBY (69) in the null industry. This means that GRMN’s stock grew similarly to HXGBY’s over the last 12 months.
GRMN's Price Growth Rating (3) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for HXGBY (81) in the null industry. This means that GRMN’s stock grew significantly faster than HXGBY’s over the last 12 months.
GRMN's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HXGBY (91) in the null industry. This means that GRMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than HXGBY’s over the last 12 months.
GRMN | HXGBY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago32% | 1 day ago63% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago43% | 1 day ago78% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 1 day ago57% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago61% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago58% | 1 day ago63% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago65% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago62% | 8 days ago65% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago55% | 2 days ago63% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago50% | 1 day ago61% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago59% | 1 day ago54% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that GRMN and FTV have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRMN and FTV's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GRMN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GRMN | 100% | -0.76% | ||
FTV - GRMN | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.76% | ||
ESE - GRMN | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.31% | ||
HXGBY - GRMN | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.17% | ||
NOVT - GRMN | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.27% | ||
ST - GRMN | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.15% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HXGBY has been loosely correlated with NOVT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HXGBY jumps, then NOVT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HXGBY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HXGBY | 100% | +1.17% | ||
NOVT - HXGBY | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
MKSI - HXGBY | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
FARO - HXGBY | 48% Loosely correlated | -4.07% | ||
FTV - HXGBY | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.76% | ||
KEYS - HXGBY | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.30% | ||
More |