GRNL
Price
$0.64
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 27 closing price
IFABF
Price
$0.75
Change
+$0.01 (+1.35%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

GRNL vs IFABF

Header iconGRNL vs IFABF Comparison
Open Charts GRNL vs IFABFBanner chart's image
Greenlite Ventures
Price$0.64
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
iFabric
Price$0.75
Change+$0.01 (+1.35%)
Volume$1.11K
CapitalizationN/A
GRNL vs IFABF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GRNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFABF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRNL vs. IFABF commentary
Dec 28, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRNL is a Hold and IFABF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 28, 2024
Stock price -- (GRNL: $0.64 vs. IFABF: $0.75)
Brand notoriety: GRNL and IFABF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Apparel/Footwear industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRNL: 26% vs. IFABF: 31%
Market capitalization -- GRNL: $87.91K vs. IFABF: $31.23M
GRNL [@Apparel/Footwear] is valued at $87.91K. IFABF’s [@Apparel/Footwear] market capitalization is $31.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry ranges from $140.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry is $6.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRNL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIFABF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GRNL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IFABF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IFABF is a better buy in the long-term than GRNL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRNL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IFABF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GRNL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • IFABF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IFABF is a better buy in the short-term than GRNL.

Price Growth

GRNL (@Apparel/Footwear) experienced а +39.24% price change this week, while IFABF (@Apparel/Footwear) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was +1.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.60%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Apparel/Footwear (+1.46% weekly)

Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IFABF($31.2M) has a higher market cap than GRNL($87.9K). IFABF YTD gains are higher at: -14.886 vs. GRNL (-30.500). IFABF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 879K vs. GRNL (-370.63K). IFABF has more cash in the bank: 3.65M vs. GRNL (19.5K). GRNL has less debt than IFABF: GRNL (44.5K) vs IFABF (1.14M). IFABF has higher revenues than GRNL: IFABF (22.9M) vs GRNL (0).
GRNLIFABFGRNL / IFABF
Capitalization87.9K31.2M0%
EBITDA-370.63K879K-42%
Gain YTD-30.500-14.886205%
P/E RatioN/A97.48-
Revenue022.9M-
Total Cash19.5K3.65M1%
Total Debt44.5K1.14M4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GRNL vs IFABF: Fundamental Ratings
GRNL
IFABF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2431
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
73100
SMR RATING
1..100
10088
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9473
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10046
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GRNL's Valuation (60) in the null industry is in the same range as IFABF (85). This means that GRNL’s stock grew similarly to IFABF’s over the last 12 months.

GRNL's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as IFABF (100). This means that GRNL’s stock grew similarly to IFABF’s over the last 12 months.

IFABF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as GRNL (100). This means that IFABF’s stock grew similarly to GRNL’s over the last 12 months.

IFABF's Price Growth Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as GRNL (94). This means that IFABF’s stock grew similarly to GRNL’s over the last 12 months.

IFABF's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRNL (100). This means that IFABF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRNL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRNLIFABF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
76%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
83%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GRNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFABF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PLGJX10.14N/A
N/A
Principal LargeCap Growth I J
HFYCX9.98N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val C
AXVIX18.44-0.21
-1.13%
Acclivity Small Cap Value I
PGIAX34.41-0.40
-1.15%
Putnam Focused Equity A
HOORX30.01-0.37
-1.22%
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps R3

GRNL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRNL and IFABF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRNL and IFABF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRNL
1D Price
Change %
GRNL100%
-0.06%
IFABF - GRNL
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HNNMY - GRNL
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.48%
GXSBY - GRNL
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JNBYF - GRNL
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HUGPF - GRNL
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IFABF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IFABF and GRNL have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IFABF and GRNL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFABF
1D Price
Change %
IFABF100%
N/A
GRNL - IFABF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
GXSBY - IFABF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HNNMY - IFABF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-1.48%
HUGPF - IFABF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDGXY - IFABF
-6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More