Ad is loading...
GSBD
Price
$12.77
Change
+$0.01 (+0.08%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
94 days until earnings call
MAIN
Price
$52.16
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
94 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GSBD vs MAIN

Header iconGSBD vs MAIN Comparison
Open Charts GSBD vs MAINBanner chart's image
Goldman Sachs BDC
Price$12.77
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
Volume$725.61K
CapitalizationN/A
Main Street Capital
Price$52.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$551.79K
CapitalizationN/A
GSBD vs MAIN Comparison Chart
Loading...
GSBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSBD vs. MAIN commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSBD is a StrongSell and MAIN is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (GSBD: $12.77 vs. MAIN: $52.16)
Brand notoriety: GSBD and MAIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSBD: 110% vs. MAIN: 152%
Market capitalization -- GSBD: $1.64B vs. MAIN: $4.02B
GSBD [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.64B. MAIN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $4.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSBD’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMAIN’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • GSBD’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MAIN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAIN is a better buy in the long-term than GSBD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GSBD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAIN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GSBD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MAIN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAIN is a better buy in the short-term than GSBD.

Price Growth

GSBD (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.69% price change this week, while MAIN (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

GSBD is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

MAIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.13% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAIN($4.02B) has a higher market cap than GSBD($1.64B). MAIN has higher P/E ratio than GSBD: MAIN (8.97) vs GSBD (8.29). MAIN YTD gains are higher at: 29.878 vs. GSBD (-4.560). MAIN (1.8B) and GSBD (1.83B) have identical debt. MAIN has higher revenues than GSBD: MAIN (510M) vs GSBD (208M).
GSBDMAINGSBD / MAIN
Capitalization1.64B4.02B41%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-4.56029.878-15%
P/E Ratio8.298.9792%
Revenue208M510M41%
Total Cash76.6MN/A-
Total Debt1.83B1.8B101%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GSBD vs MAIN: Fundamental Ratings
GSBD
MAIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5722
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8428
SMR RATING
1..100
1613
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7346
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1748
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GSBD's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as MAIN (29). This means that GSBD’s stock grew similarly to MAIN’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSBD (84). This means that MAIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's SMR Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as GSBD (16). This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as GSBD (73). This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

GSBD's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as MAIN (48). This means that GSBD’s stock grew similarly to MAIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSBDMAIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GSBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EICVX18.720.04
+0.21%
EIC Value A
GQGPX16.96-0.05
-0.29%
GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Inv
KDHCX59.53-0.49
-0.82%
DWS CROCI Equity Dividend C
PAGYX21.91-0.24
-1.08%
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Gr Y
RYCVX181.40-2.58
-1.40%
Rydex Dow 2x Strategy H

GSBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSBD has been loosely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GSBD jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSBD
1D Price
Change %
GSBD100%
+0.08%
ARCC - GSBD
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
BXSL - GSBD
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
MAIN - GSBD
54%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CCAP - GSBD
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
BCSF - GSBD
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
More

MAIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAIN has been closely correlated with HTGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAIN jumps, then HTGC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAIN
1D Price
Change %
MAIN100%
N/A
HTGC - MAIN
69%
Closely correlated
-0.68%
CSWC - MAIN
67%
Closely correlated
-0.56%
ARCC - MAIN
67%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
MFIC - MAIN
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.03%
FSK - MAIN
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
More