GSBD
Price
$9.85
Change
-$0.20 (-1.99%)
Updated
Apr 8 closing price
Capitalization
1.64B
22 days until earnings call
MAIN
Price
$49.15
Change
-$1.15 (-2.29%)
Updated
Apr 8 closing price
Capitalization
4.02B
22 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GSBD vs MAIN

Header iconGSBD vs MAIN Comparison
Open Charts GSBD vs MAINBanner chart's image
Goldman Sachs BDC
Price$9.85
Change-$0.20 (-1.99%)
Volume$1.83M
Capitalization1.64B
Main Street Capital
Price$49.15
Change-$1.15 (-2.29%)
Volume$896K
Capitalization4.02B
GSBD vs MAIN Comparison Chart
Loading...
GSBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSBD vs. MAIN commentary
Apr 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSBD is a StrongBuy and MAIN is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 09, 2025
Stock price -- (GSBD: $9.85 vs. MAIN: $49.15)
Brand notoriety: GSBD and MAIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSBD: 203% vs. MAIN: 148%
Market capitalization -- GSBD: $1.64B vs. MAIN: $4.02B
GSBD [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.64B. MAIN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $4.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSBD’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMAIN’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • GSBD’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MAIN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAIN is a better buy in the long-term than GSBD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GSBD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GSBD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MAIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GSBD is a better buy in the short-term than MAIN.

Price Growth

GSBD (@Investment Managers) experienced а -15.60% price change this week, while MAIN (@Investment Managers) price change was -14.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -7.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

GSBD is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

MAIN is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-7.97% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAIN($4.02B) has a higher market cap than GSBD($1.64B). MAIN has higher P/E ratio than GSBD: MAIN (8.97) vs GSBD (8.29). MAIN YTD gains are higher at: -14.151 vs. GSBD (-15.235). MAIN (1.8B) and GSBD (1.83B) have identical debt. MAIN has higher revenues than GSBD: MAIN (510M) vs GSBD (208M).
GSBDMAINGSBD / MAIN
Capitalization1.64B4.02B41%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-15.235-14.151108%
P/E Ratio8.298.9792%
Revenue208M510M41%
Total Cash76.6MN/A-
Total Debt1.83B1.8B101%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GSBD vs MAIN: Fundamental Ratings
GSBD
MAIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6364
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
568
SMR RATING
1..100
109
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7857
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
543
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GSBD's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as MAIN (26). This means that GSBD’s stock grew similarly to MAIN’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSBD (56). This means that MAIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as GSBD (10). This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as GSBD (78). This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

GSBD's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAIN (43). This means that GSBD’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSBDMAIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GSBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TOLLX15.26N/A
N/A
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure A
MGISX31.95N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Franchise R6
RMYAX9.05N/A
N/A
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income A
AFJCX17.77N/A
N/A
Virtus NFJ International Value C
RGBEX34.81-0.20
-0.57%
American Funds Global Balanced R4

GSBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSBD has been closely correlated with MAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSBD jumps, then MAIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSBD
1D Price
Change %
GSBD100%
-1.99%
MAIN - GSBD
69%
Closely correlated
-1.80%
ARCC - GSBD
69%
Closely correlated
-2.07%
GLAD - GSBD
67%
Closely correlated
+0.26%
NMFC - GSBD
66%
Closely correlated
-2.36%
CSWC - GSBD
66%
Loosely correlated
-3.80%
More

MAIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAIN has been closely correlated with GLAD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAIN jumps, then GLAD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAIN
1D Price
Change %
MAIN100%
-1.80%
GLAD - MAIN
76%
Closely correlated
+0.26%
HTGC - MAIN
75%
Closely correlated
-2.17%
BXSL - MAIN
74%
Closely correlated
-4.34%
ARCC - MAIN
73%
Closely correlated
-2.07%
CSWC - MAIN
66%
Closely correlated
-3.80%
More