Ad is loading...
GSCGX vs RWEBX
GSCGX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts GSCGX vs RWEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Core A
Price$29.83
Change+$2.65 (+9.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$59.38
Change+$4.26 (+7.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets167.99B
GSCGX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSCGX vs. RWEBX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSCGX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 168B vs. GSCGX (1.11B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than GSCGX: RWEBX (0.83) vs GSCGX (0.35). GSCGX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: GSCGX (35 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). GSCGX (1.13) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). GSCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWEBX (31.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSCGX: RWEBX (250) vs GSCGX (1000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.93 vs. GSCGX (-16.14). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 41.18 vs. GSCGX (30.93).
| GSCGX | RWEBX | GSCGX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.06 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 1.06 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.825 | -9.687 | 163% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 168B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.83 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.14 | -8.93 | 181% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.15 | -4.32 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.93 | 41.18 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.33 | 38.06 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...