Ad is loading...
GSCGX vs RWMFX
GSCGX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GSCGX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Core A
Price$29.83
Change+$2.65 (+9.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$59.75
Change+$4.29 (+7.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets167.99B
GSCGX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSCGX vs. RWMFX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSCGX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 168B vs. GSCGX (1.11B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GSCGX: RWMFX (1.53) vs GSCGX (0.35). GSCGX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GSCGX (35 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GSCGX (1.13) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GSCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWMFX (31.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSCGX: RWMFX (250) vs GSCGX (1000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.19 vs. GSCGX (-16.14). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.88 vs. GSCGX (30.93).
| GSCGX | RWMFX | GSCGX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.31 | 323% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.31 | 365% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.825 | -9.504 | 167% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 168B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 1.53 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.14 | -8.19 | 197% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.15 | -2.62 | 235% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.93 | 44.88 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.33 | 42.44 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...