Ad is loading...
GSCGX vs RWMFX
GSCGX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GSCGX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity A
Price$32.47
Change+$0.25 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.29B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$63.01
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets190.29B
GSCGX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSCGX vs. RWMFX commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSCGX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 190B vs. GSCGX (1.29B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GSCGX: RWMFX (1.54) vs GSCGX (0.35). GSCGX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GSCGX (35 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GSCGX (1.13) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GSCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWMFX (31.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSCGX: RWMFX (250) vs GSCGX (1000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.02 vs. GSCGX (-0.44). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 62.59 vs. GSCGX (50.90).
| GSCGX | RWMFX | GSCGX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.31 | 323% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.31 | 365% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.217 | 2.815 | -8% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.29B | 190B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 1.54 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.44 | 4.02 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.96 | 19.29 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.90 | 62.59 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.59 | 60.63 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...