Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSCGX vs RWMFX
GSCGX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GSCGX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity A
Price$33.18
Change+$0.31 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.31B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$64.97
Change+$0.35 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets194.6B
GSCGX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSCGX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSCGX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 195B vs. GSCGX (1.31B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GSCGX: RWMFX (1.47) vs GSCGX (0.33). GSCGX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GSCGX (35 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GSCGX (1.13) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GSCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWMFX (31.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSCGX: RWMFX (250) vs GSCGX (1000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.12 vs. GSCGX (0.27). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.94 vs. GSCGX (36.65).
| GSCGX | RWMFX | GSCGX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.31 | 323% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.31 | 365% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.796 | 6.014 | 30% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 195B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 1.47 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.27 | 6.12 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.40 | 18.81 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.65 | 49.94 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.82 | 69.11 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement