Ad is loading...
GSCGX vs RWMFX
GSCGX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GSCGX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Core A
Price$33.09
Change+$0.29 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$62.97
Change+$0.49 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets193.4B
GSCGX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSCGX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSCGX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 193B vs. GSCGX (1.38B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GSCGX: RWMFX (1.70) vs GSCGX (0.32). GSCGX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GSCGX (35 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GSCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. RWMFX (30.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSCGX: RWMFX (250) vs GSCGX (1000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.39 vs. GSCGX (11.75). RWMFX (35.03) and GSCGX (34.15) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GSCGX | RWMFX | GSCGX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.478 | 2.340 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.38B | 193B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 1.70 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.75 | 12.39 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.30 | 11.20 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.15 | 35.03 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.30 | 65.23 | 57% |