Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSCGX vs RWMFX
GSCGX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GSCGX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity A
Price$34.69
Change+$0.19 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.36B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$64.64
Change+$0.19 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets201.46B
GSCGX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSCGX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSCGX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 201B vs. GSCGX (1.36B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GSCGX: RWMFX (1.48) vs GSCGX (0.32). GSCGX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GSCGX (35 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GSCGX (1.13) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GSCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSCGX: RWMFX (250) vs GSCGX (1000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.95 vs. GSCGX (0.98). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 52.59 vs. GSCGX (41.16).
| GSCGX | RWMFX | GSCGX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.31 | 323% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.31 | 365% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.844 | 5.870 | 117% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.36B | 201B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 1.48 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.98 | 5.95 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.53 | 33.84 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.16 | 52.59 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.69 | 67.29 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement