GSHRF
Price
$0.32
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
20.85M
SAPLF
Price
$1.07
Change
-$0.06 (-5.26%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
345.68M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GSHRF vs SAPLF

Header iconGSHRF vs SAPLF Comparison
Open Charts GSHRF vs SAPLFBanner chart's image
Goldshore Resources
Price$0.32
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$67.1K
Capitalization20.85M
Sylvania Platinum
Price$1.07
Change-$0.06 (-5.26%)
Volume$200
Capitalization345.68M
GSHRF vs SAPLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GSHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAPLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSHRF vs. SAPLF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSHRF is a Hold and SAPLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (GSHRF: $0.32 vs. SAPLF: $1.08)
Brand notoriety: GSHRF and SAPLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSHRF: 122% vs. SAPLF: 1%
Market capitalization -- GSHRF: $20.85M vs. SAPLF: $345.68M
GSHRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $20.85M. SAPLF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $345.68M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSHRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSAPLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GSHRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SAPLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SAPLF is a better buy in the long-term than GSHRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GSHRF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAPLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GSHRF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SAPLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GSHRF is a better buy in the short-term than SAPLF.

Price Growth

GSHRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +10.86% price change this week, while SAPLF (@Precious Metals) price change was +13.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.16%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.16% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAPLF($346M) has a higher market cap than GSHRF($20.8M). SAPLF YTD gains are higher at: 99.074 vs. GSHRF (90.265). SAPLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 84.5M vs. GSHRF (-2.2M). SAPLF has more cash in the bank: 94.1M vs. GSHRF (4M). SAPLF has less debt than GSHRF: SAPLF (84K) vs GSHRF (345K). SAPLF has higher revenues than GSHRF: SAPLF (152M) vs GSHRF (0).
GSHRFSAPLFGSHRF / SAPLF
Capitalization20.8M346M6%
EBITDA-2.2M84.5M-3%
Gain YTD90.26599.07491%
P/E RatioN/A6.47-
Revenue0152M-
Total Cash4M94.1M4%
Total Debt345K84K411%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GSHRF vs SAPLF: Fundamental Ratings
GSHRF
SAPLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5883
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8376
SMR RATING
1..100
9281
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3837
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10010
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAPLF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as GSHRF (40). This means that SAPLF’s stock grew similarly to GSHRF’s over the last 12 months.

SAPLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as GSHRF (83). This means that SAPLF’s stock grew similarly to GSHRF’s over the last 12 months.

SAPLF's SMR Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as GSHRF (92). This means that SAPLF’s stock grew similarly to GSHRF’s over the last 12 months.

SAPLF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as GSHRF (38). This means that SAPLF’s stock grew similarly to GSHRF’s over the last 12 months.

SAPLF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GSHRF (100). This means that SAPLF’s stock grew significantly faster than GSHRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSHRFSAPLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GSHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAPLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RCGTX15.360.09
+0.59%
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology C
JLCFX73.890.34
+0.46%
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core R4
TLACX12.100.05
+0.41%
Transamerica Large Core ESG A
IIRSX12.530.05
+0.40%
Voya Russell Small Cap Index Port I
CGLIX18.450.06
+0.33%
Calvert Global Equity Fund Class I

GSHRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GSHRF and SSVFF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GSHRF and SSVFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSHRF
1D Price
Change %
GSHRF100%
-1.70%
SSVFF - GSHRF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
LGDTF - GSHRF
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.93%
CHPGF - GSHRF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
LOMLF - GSHRF
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.50%
DTARF - GSHRF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.12%
More

SAPLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SAPLF and STPGF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SAPLF and STPGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAPLF
1D Price
Change %
SAPLF100%
N/A
STPGF - SAPLF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
ZIJMF - SAPLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
RUPRF - SAPLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
GSHRF - SAPLF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.70%
NFGC - SAPLF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
More