GSHRF
Price
$0.29
Change
-$0.01 (-3.33%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
20.85M
SMDRF
Price
$0.53
Change
-$0.04 (-7.02%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
36.38M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GSHRF vs SMDRF

Header iconGSHRF vs SMDRF Comparison
Open Charts GSHRF vs SMDRFBanner chart's image
Goldshore Resources
Price$0.29
Change-$0.01 (-3.33%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization20.85M
Sierra Madre Gold and Silver
Price$0.53
Change-$0.04 (-7.02%)
Volume$28.7K
Capitalization36.38M
GSHRF vs SMDRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GSHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMDRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSHRF vs. SMDRF commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSHRF is a Buy and SMDRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (GSHRF: $0.29 vs. SMDRF: $0.53)
Brand notoriety: GSHRF and SMDRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSHRF: 5% vs. SMDRF: 113%
Market capitalization -- GSHRF: $20.85M vs. SMDRF: $36.38M
GSHRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $20.85M. SMDRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $36.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSHRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMDRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GSHRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SMDRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMDRF is a better buy in the long-term than GSHRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GSHRF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMDRF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GSHRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SMDRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GSHRF is a better buy in the short-term than SMDRF.

Price Growth

GSHRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -0.66% price change this week, while SMDRF (@Precious Metals) price change was +4.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +53.95%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.91% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMDRF($36.4M) has a higher market cap than GSHRF($20.8M). GSHRF YTD gains are higher at: 74.634 vs. SMDRF (52.113). GSHRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.2M vs. SMDRF (-8.89M). GSHRF has more cash in the bank: 4M vs. SMDRF (3.19M). GSHRF (0) and SMDRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GSHRFSMDRFGSHRF / SMDRF
Capitalization20.8M36.4M57%
EBITDA-2.2M-8.89M25%
Gain YTD74.63452.113143%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash4M3.19M125%
Total Debt345KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GSHRF: Fundamental Ratings
GSHRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
84
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSHRFSMDRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GSHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMDRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTRMF0.080.01
+20.71%
Battery Mineral Resources Corp.
RNSDF45.84N/A
N/A
Renault SA
CEHCF30.00N/A
N/A
Cosmo Energy Hldgs Co Ltd
HNFSA45.00N/A
N/A
Hanover Foods Corp.
CBDBY0.58-0.01
-1.69%
Companhia Brasileira de Distribuicao

GSHRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GSHRF and SSVFF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GSHRF and SSVFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSHRF
1D Price
Change %
GSHRF100%
-2.32%
SSVFF - GSHRF
29%
Poorly correlated
-14.86%
LGDTF - GSHRF
28%
Poorly correlated
-4.60%
CHPGF - GSHRF
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.58%
LOMLF - GSHRF
26%
Poorly correlated
+6.24%
DTARF - GSHRF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
More

SMDRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SMDRF and CRTIF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMDRF and CRTIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMDRF
1D Price
Change %
SMDRF100%
-5.64%
CRTIF - SMDRF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SIREF - SMDRF
25%
Poorly correlated
-12.27%
GSHRF - SMDRF
17%
Poorly correlated
-2.32%
MFGCF - SMDRF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
ANPMF - SMDRF
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.69%
More