GSMGF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 30 closing price
Capitalization
22.48M
HCHDF
Price
$4.21
Change
+$0.40 (+10.50%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
510.46M
68 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GSMGF vs HCHDF

Header iconGSMGF vs HCHDF Comparison
Open Charts GSMGF vs HCHDFBanner chart's image
Indiana Res
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization22.48M
Hochschild Mining
Price$4.21
Change+$0.40 (+10.50%)
Volume$15.29K
Capitalization510.46M
GSMGF vs HCHDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
HCHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSMGF vs. HCHDF commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSMGF is a Hold and HCHDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (GSMGF: $0.04 vs. HCHDF: $4.21)
Brand notoriety: GSMGF and HCHDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSMGF: 9% vs. HCHDF: 67%
Market capitalization -- GSMGF: $22.48M vs. HCHDF: $510.46M
GSMGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $22.48M. HCHDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $510.46M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSMGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHCHDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GSMGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HCHDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HCHDF is a better buy in the long-term than GSMGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HCHDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HCHDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

GSMGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HCHDF (@Precious Metals) price change was +17.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +47.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

HCHDF is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.29% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HCHDF($510M) has a higher market cap than GSMGF($22.5M). HCHDF YTD gains are higher at: 64.628 vs. GSMGF (15.625). HCHDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 214M vs. GSMGF (-1.42M). HCHDF has more cash in the bank: 204M vs. GSMGF (504K). GSMGF has less debt than HCHDF: GSMGF (315K) vs HCHDF (314M). HCHDF has higher revenues than GSMGF: HCHDF (764M) vs GSMGF (212M).
GSMGFHCHDFGSMGF / HCHDF
Capitalization22.5M510M4%
EBITDA-1.42M214M-1%
Gain YTD15.62564.62824%
P/E RatioN/A99.01-
Revenue212M764M28%
Total Cash504K204M0%
Total Debt315K314M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GSMGF vs HCHDF: Fundamental Ratings
GSMGF
HCHDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2579
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10045
SMR RATING
1..100
9590
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5238
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3488
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HCHDF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as GSMGF (39). This means that HCHDF’s stock grew similarly to GSMGF’s over the last 12 months.

HCHDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSMGF (100). This means that HCHDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSMGF’s over the last 12 months.

HCHDF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as GSMGF (95). This means that HCHDF’s stock grew similarly to GSMGF’s over the last 12 months.

HCHDF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as GSMGF (52). This means that HCHDF’s stock grew similarly to GSMGF’s over the last 12 months.

GSMGF's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HCHDF (88). This means that GSMGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HCHDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HCHDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HCHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NSCS26.68N/A
N/A
Nuveen Small Cap Select ETF
SBND18.57-0.03
-0.16%
Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF
FUNL42.25-0.08
-0.18%
CornerCap Fundametrics® Lrg-Cap ETF FUNL
GSPY32.35-0.15
-0.45%
Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF
GDV24.84-0.18
-0.72%
Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust (The)

GSMGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSMGF has been loosely correlated with SRBIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GSMGF jumps, then SRBIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSMGF
1D Price
Change %
GSMGF100%
N/A
SRBIF - GSMGF
44%
Loosely correlated
-4.35%
GMDMF - GSMGF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GRCAF - GSMGF
10%
Poorly correlated
+17.06%
HBEIF - GSMGF
6%
Poorly correlated
-4.10%
HCHDF - GSMGF
5%
Poorly correlated
+10.44%
More

HCHDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCHDF has been loosely correlated with HMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HCHDF jumps, then HMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCHDF
1D Price
Change %
HCHDF100%
+10.44%
HMY - HCHDF
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.88%
AU - HCHDF
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.08%
DRD - HCHDF
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.28%
GFI - HCHDF
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.52%
FSM - HCHDF
38%
Loosely correlated
+9.79%
More