GSMGF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.03 (-50.00%)
Updated
Oct 29 closing price
TRGGF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

GSMGF vs TRGGF

Header iconGSMGF vs TRGGF Comparison
Open Charts GSMGF vs TRGGFBanner chart's image
Indiana Res
Price$0.03
Change-$0.03 (-50.00%)
Volume$355
CapitalizationN/A
Tarachi Gold
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$53K
CapitalizationN/A
GSMGF vs TRGGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GSMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSMGF vs. TRGGF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSMGF is a Hold and TRGGF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (GSMGF: $0.03 vs. TRGGF: $0.01)
Brand notoriety: GSMGF and TRGGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSMGF: 46% vs. TRGGF: 45%
Market capitalization -- GSMGF: $22.48M vs. TRGGF: $2.25M
GSMGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $22.48M. TRGGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSMGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTRGGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GSMGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TRGGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GSMGF is a better buy in the long-term than TRGGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GSMGF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRGGF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GSMGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • TRGGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GSMGF is a better buy in the short-term than TRGGF.

Price Growth

GSMGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TRGGF (@Precious Metals) price change was -32.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSMGF($22.5M) has a higher market cap than TRGGF($2.25M). GSMGF YTD gains are higher at: -31.486 vs. TRGGF (-43.548). TRGGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.07M vs. GSMGF (-1.42M). GSMGF has more cash in the bank: 504K vs. TRGGF (252K). TRGGF has less debt than GSMGF: TRGGF (71.5K) vs GSMGF (315K). GSMGF has higher revenues than TRGGF: GSMGF (212M) vs TRGGF (0).
GSMGFTRGGFGSMGF / TRGGF
Capitalization22.5M2.25M1,000%
EBITDA-1.42M-1.07M133%
Gain YTD-31.486-43.54872%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue212M0-
Total Cash504K252K200%
Total Debt315K71.5K441%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GSMGF: Fundamental Ratings
GSMGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
25
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
76
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSMGFTRGGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GSMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KBIWX12.96N/A
N/A
KBI Global Investors Aquarius Instl
DREVX21.14-0.11
-0.52%
BNY Mellon Large Cap Securities Inc
FIDEX12.98-0.38
-2.84%
Fidelity SAI Sustainable U.S. Equity Fd
ARYGX12.80-0.49
-3.69%
American Century Global Real Estate R5
VAFCX23.36-0.96
-3.95%
Invesco American Franchise C

GSMGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSMGF has been loosely correlated with SRBIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GSMGF jumps, then SRBIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSMGF
1D Price
Change %
GSMGF100%
N/A
SRBIF - GSMGF
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GMDMF - GSMGF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SLRRF - GSMGF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TRGGF - GSMGF
23%
Poorly correlated
-22.79%
GRCAF - GSMGF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TRGGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRGGF and SLRRF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRGGF and SLRRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRGGF
1D Price
Change %
TRGGF100%
N/A
SLRRF - TRGGF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PNGZF - TRGGF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GSMGF - TRGGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLTMF - TRGGF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRBIF - TRGGF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More