Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSMUX vs NMBAX
GSMUX vs NMBAX Comparison
Open Charts GSMUX vs NMBAX
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Inc C
Price$14.90
Change-$0.04 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.02B
Nuveen Intermediate Duration Muni Bd A
Price$8.66
Change-$0.02 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.89B
GSMUX vs NMBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSMUX vs. NMBAX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSMUX is a Hold and NMBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSMUX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. NMBAX (7.89B). NMBAX pays higher dividends than GSMUX: NMBAX (3.08) vs GSMUX (2.67). GSMUX was incepted earlier than NMBAX: GSMUX (28 years) vs NMBAX (30 years). GSMUX (1.50) is less costly to investors than NMBAX (0.65). GSMUX (27.00) and NMBAX (27.00) have comparable annual turnover. GSMUX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMBAX: GSMUX (1000) vs NMBAX (3000). NMBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.66 vs. GSMUX (-0.34). NMBAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.03 vs. GSMUX (1.14).
| GSMUX | NMBAX | GSMUX / NMBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.65 | 228% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.65 | 231% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.165 | 0.518 | -225% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 7.89B | 140% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.67 | 3.08 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.34 | 0.66 | -52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.46 | 6.81 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.14 | 3.03 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.28 | 14.99 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers