Ad is loading...
GSPIX vs RWMFX
GSPIX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GSPIX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Core Instl
Price$40.46
Change-$0.78 (-1.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.36B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$64.14
Change-$0.88 (-1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets196.11B
GSPIX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSPIX vs. RWMFX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSPIX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 196B vs. GSPIX (1.36B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GSPIX: RWMFX (1.70) vs GSPIX (0.50). GSPIX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GSPIX (28 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GSPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. RWMFX (30.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSPIX: RWMFX (250) vs GSPIX (1000000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.20 vs. GSPIX (7.51). GSPIX return over 5 years is better than : 42.03 vs. RWMFX (38.24).
| GSPIX | RWMFX | GSPIX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.940 | 4.242 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.36B | 196B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.70 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.51 | 8.20 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.76 | 18.09 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.03 | 38.24 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.04 | 61.66 | 76% |