Ad is loading...
GSPIX vs RWMFX
GSPIX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GSPIX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity Instl
Price$38.38
Change+$0.23 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.26B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$61.79
Change+$0.24 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets185.91B
GSPIX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSPIX vs. RWMFX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSPIX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 186B vs. GSPIX (1.26B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GSPIX: RWMFX (1.54) vs GSPIX (0.51). GSPIX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GSPIX (28 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GSPIX (0.77) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GSPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWMFX (31.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSPIX: RWMFX (250) vs GSPIX (1000000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.84 vs. GSPIX (-1.39). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 55.80 vs. GSPIX (51.09).
| GSPIX | RWMFX | GSPIX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.31 | 226% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.31 | 248% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.880 | 0.825 | -471% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 186B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 1.54 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.39 | 2.84 | -49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.33 | 18.23 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.09 | 55.80 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.33 | 58.62 | 67% |