GSRCF
Price
$0.08
Change
+$0.01 (+14.29%)
Updated
Feb 10 closing price
Capitalization
1.71M
MMTMF
Price
$0.26
Change
-$0.02 (-7.14%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
36.12M
Ad is loading...

GSRCF vs MMTMF

Header iconGSRCF vs MMTMF Comparison
Open Charts GSRCF vs MMTMFBanner chart's image
GSP RESOURCE
Price$0.08
Change+$0.01 (+14.29%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization1.71M
Monument Mining
Price$0.26
Change-$0.02 (-7.14%)
Volume$29.56K
Capitalization36.12M
GSRCF vs MMTMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSRCF vs. MMTMF commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSRCF is a Hold and MMTMF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (GSRCF: $0.08 vs. MMTMF: $0.26)
Brand notoriety: GSRCF and MMTMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSRCF: 87% vs. MMTMF: 92%
Market capitalization -- GSRCF: $1.71M vs. MMTMF: $36.12M
GSRCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.71M. MMTMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $36.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSRCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMMTMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GSRCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MMTMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GSRCF and MMTMF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

GSRCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MMTMF (@Precious Metals) price change was -0.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.98%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.88% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MMTMF($36.1M) has a higher market cap than GSRCF($1.71M). MMTMF YTD gains are higher at: 40.541 vs. GSRCF (-1.750). GSRCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -277.32K vs. MMTMF (-2.04M). MMTMF has more cash in the bank: 9.81M vs. GSRCF (152K). MMTMF has higher revenues than GSRCF: MMTMF (10.1M) vs GSRCF (0).
GSRCFMMTMFGSRCF / MMTMF
Capitalization1.71M36.1M5%
EBITDA-277.32K-2.04M14%
Gain YTD-1.75040.541-4%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue010.1M-
Total Cash152K9.81M2%
Total DebtN/A315K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MMTMF: Fundamental Ratings
MMTMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
21
SMR RATING
1..100
75
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
74
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GFSIX16.73-0.16
-0.95%
Gabelli Global Financial Services I
GCPNX20.25-0.22
-1.07%
Gateway Equity Call Premium N
PACOX59.60-1.10
-1.81%
T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Adv
BGATX17.02-0.35
-1.99%
Baillie Gifford Global Alpha Equities 2
LSSNX29.08-0.91
-3.03%
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth N

GSRCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSRCF has been loosely correlated with BGUUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GSRCF jumps, then BGUUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSRCF
1D Price
Change %
GSRCF100%
N/A
BGUUF - GSRCF
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MMTMF - GSRCF
29%
Poorly correlated
-7.14%
SBLRF - GSRCF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRCUF - GSRCF
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.41%
THM - GSRCF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
More

MMTMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MMTMF and GSRCF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MMTMF and GSRCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMTMF
1D Price
Change %
MMTMF100%
-7.14%
GSRCF - MMTMF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ORAAF - MMTMF
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.70%
RKHNF - MMTMF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLG - MMTMF
23%
Poorly correlated
-9.72%
PZG - MMTMF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.78%
More