Ad is loading...
GSTRX vs RGAFX
GSTRX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts GSTRX vs RGAFX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth R
Price$8.85
Change-$0.02 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets178.01M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$72.59
Change-$0.09 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.48B
GSTRX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSTRX vs. RGAFX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSTRX is a Buy and RGAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. GSTRX (178M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than GSTRX: RGAFX (0.65) vs GSTRX (0.00). GSTRX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: GSTRX (16 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). GSTRX (1.57) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). GSTRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). GSTRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: GSTRX (0) vs RGAFX (250). RGAFX (3.45) and GSTRX (3.39) have marching annual gain over last year. RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.83 vs. GSTRX (7.40).
| GSTRX | RGAFX | GSTRX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.34 | 376% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.34 | 462% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.646 | -2.459 | 270% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 178M | 285B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.65 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.39 | 3.45 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.90 | 33.96 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.40 | 45.83 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | -27.38 | 63.63 | -43% |