Ad is loading...
GSVRF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
11 days until earnings call
VLMGF
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.01 (-5.26%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

GSVRF vs VLMGF

Header iconGSVRF vs VLMGF Comparison
Open Charts GSVRF vs VLMGFBanner chart's image
GUANAJUATO SILVER
Price$0.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$891.76K
CapitalizationN/A
Viscount Mining
Price$0.18
Change-$0.01 (-5.26%)
Volume$40K
CapitalizationN/A
GSVRF vs VLMGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GSVRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSVRF vs. VLMGF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSVRF is a Sell and VLMGF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (GSVRF: $0.14 vs. VLMGF: $0.18)
Brand notoriety: GSVRF and VLMGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSVRF: 136% vs. VLMGF: 196%
Market capitalization -- GSVRF: $85.47M vs. VLMGF: $13M
GSVRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $85.47M. VLMGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSVRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVLMGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GSVRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VLMGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, VLMGF is a better buy in the long-term than GSVRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GSVRF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GSVRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

GSVRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -18.65% price change this week, while VLMGF (@Precious Metals) price change was -3.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

GSVRF is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSVRF($85.5M) has a higher market cap than VLMGF($13M). VLMGF YTD gains are higher at: -6.823 vs. GSVRF (-29.471). VLMGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.65M vs. GSVRF (-15.3M). GSVRF has more cash in the bank: 5.28M vs. VLMGF (483K). VLMGF has less debt than GSVRF: VLMGF (12.7K) vs GSVRF (19M). GSVRF has higher revenues than VLMGF: GSVRF (47.6M) vs VLMGF (0).
GSVRFVLMGFGSVRF / VLMGF
Capitalization85.5M13M658%
EBITDA-15.3M-1.65M926%
Gain YTD-29.471-6.823432%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue47.6M0-
Total Cash5.28M483K1,092%
Total Debt19M12.7K149,606%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GSVRF vs VLMGF: Fundamental Ratings
GSVRF
VLMGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7493
SMR RATING
1..100
9792
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8646
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VLMGF's Valuation (58) in the null industry is in the same range as GSVRF (62). This means that VLMGF’s stock grew similarly to GSVRF’s over the last 12 months.

GSVRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as VLMGF (93). This means that GSVRF’s stock grew similarly to VLMGF’s over the last 12 months.

VLMGF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as GSVRF (97). This means that VLMGF’s stock grew similarly to GSVRF’s over the last 12 months.

VLMGF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSVRF (86). This means that VLMGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSVRF’s over the last 12 months.

VLMGF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GSVRF (100). This means that VLMGF’s stock grew similarly to GSVRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSVRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GSVRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UVXY22.102.11
+10.56%
ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures
RNRG9.280.07
+0.76%
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF
ELC21.890.08
+0.37%
Entergy Louisiana LLC
HEDJ43.26-0.01
-0.02%
WisdomTree Europe Hedged Equity ETF
WCBR26.97-0.65
-2.35%
WisdomTree Cybersecurity ETF

GSVRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSVRF has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GSVRF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSVRF
1D Price
Change %
GSVRF100%
+1.23%
PAAS - GSVRF
55%
Loosely correlated
-2.15%
HL - GSVRF
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.79%
MAG - GSVRF
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.97%
CDE - GSVRF
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.44%
ASM - GSVRF
49%
Loosely correlated
-7.21%
More

VLMGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VLMGF and LVGLF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VLMGF and LVGLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VLMGF
1D Price
Change %
VLMGF100%
-2.66%
LVGLF - VLMGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VLMZF - VLMGF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VGGOF - VLMGF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BSXGF - VLMGF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.07%
GSVRF - VLMGF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.23%
More