GT
Price
$10.09
Change
-$0.19 (-1.85%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
3.9B
88 days until earnings call
IAC
Price
$38.83
Change
-$0.47 (-1.20%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
4.59B
2 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GT vs IAC

Header iconGT vs IAC Comparison
Open Charts GT vs IACBanner chart's image
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (The)
Price$10.09
Change-$0.19 (-1.85%)
Volume$5.24M
Capitalization3.9B
IAC
Price$38.83
Change-$0.47 (-1.20%)
Volume$1.06M
Capitalization4.59B
GT vs IAC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GT vs. IAC commentary
Aug 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GT is a Buy and IAC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 02, 2025
Stock price -- (GT: $10.09 vs. IAC: $39.29)
Brand notoriety: GT: Notable vs. IAC: Not notable
GT represents the Auto Parts: OEM, while IAC is part of the Internet Software/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GT: 83% vs. IAC: 131%
Market capitalization -- GT: $3.9B vs. IAC: $4.59B
GT [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $3.9B. IAC’s [@Internet Software/Services] market capitalization is $4.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Software/Services] industry ranges from $1.94T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.73B. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Software/Services] industry is $71.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIAC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IAC is a better buy in the long-term than GT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IAC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • IAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IAC is a better buy in the short-term than GT.

Price Growth

GT (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -7.52% price change this week, while IAC (@Internet Software/Services) price change was -3.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -3.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.00%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was -4.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

GT is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

IAC is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-3.68% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

@Internet Software/Services (-4.37% weekly)

Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IAC($4.59B) has a higher market cap than GT($3.9B). GT has higher P/E ratio than IAC: GT (769.23) vs IAC (17.99). GT YTD gains are higher at: 12.111 vs. IAC (9.268). IAC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 996M vs. GT (856M). IAC has more cash in the bank: 1.45B vs. GT (902M). IAC has less debt than GT: IAC (2.02B) vs GT (8.65B). GT has higher revenues than IAC: GT (20.1B) vs IAC (4.37B).
GTIACGT / IAC
Capitalization3.9B4.59B85%
EBITDA856M996M86%
Gain YTD12.1119.268131%
P/E Ratio769.2317.994,276%
Revenue20.1B4.37B460%
Total Cash902M1.45B62%
Total Debt8.65B2.02B428%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GT vs IAC: Fundamental Ratings
GT
IAC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6411
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
91100
SMR RATING
1..100
8292
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5950
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9876
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IAC's Valuation (51) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as GT (57) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that IAC’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.

GT's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as IAC (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that GT’s stock grew similarly to IAC’s over the last 12 months.

GT's SMR Rating (82) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as IAC (92) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that GT’s stock grew similarly to IAC’s over the last 12 months.

IAC's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as GT (59) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that IAC’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.

IAC's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as GT (98) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that IAC’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTIAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FAGCX225.74N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opps I
MRRFX16.95N/A
N/A
BlackRock Mid-Cap Value R
LSWWX25.96N/A
N/A
Loomis Sayles Global Allocation Y
GGEFX26.40N/A
N/A
Summitry Equity Fund
TMVIX24.20N/A
N/A
Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Value I

IAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IAC has been loosely correlated with ANGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IAC jumps, then ANGI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IAC
1D Price
Change %
IAC100%
-1.20%
ANGI - IAC
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.22%
SNAP - IAC
53%
Loosely correlated
-4.03%
MTCH - IAC
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.96%
YELP - IAC
50%
Loosely correlated
-4.04%
SSTK - IAC
48%
Loosely correlated
-5.28%
More