Ad is loading...
GTAPX vs NLSCX
GTAPX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts GTAPX vs NLSCX
Glenmede Long/Short Eq Ptf
Price$13.40
Change+$0.05 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.03M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$17.90
Change+$0.09 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.24B
GTAPX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTAPX vs. NLSCX commentary
May 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTAPX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.24B vs. GTAPX (44M). GTAPX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: GTAPX (1.83) vs NLSCX (0.00). GTAPX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: GTAPX (19 years) vs NLSCX (13 years). GTAPX (2.99) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. GTAPX (0.99). GTAPX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSCX: GTAPX (0) vs NLSCX (1000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.65 vs. GTAPX (0.81). GTAPX return over 5 years is better than : 34.44 vs. NLSCX (25.23).
| GTAPX | NLSCX | GTAPX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.52 | 2.43 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.99 | 2.43 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.933 | 0.678 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44M | 7.24B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.81 | 6.65 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.21 | 9.74 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.44 | 25.23 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.24 | 29.65 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers