Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTAPX vs NLSIX
GTAPX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts GTAPX vs NLSIX
Glenmede Long/Short Eq Ptf
Price$13.91
Change+$0.09 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.16M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$19.81
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.56B
GTAPX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTAPX vs. NLSIX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTAPX is a Hold and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.56B vs. GTAPX (45.2M). GTAPX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: GTAPX (1.62) vs NLSIX (0.02). GTAPX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: GTAPX (19 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). GTAPX (2.99) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. GTAPX (0.99). GTAPX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: GTAPX (0) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.76 vs. GTAPX (1.70). GTAPX return over 5 years is better than : 31.31 vs. NLSIX (28.85).
| GTAPX | NLSIX | GTAPX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.52 | 1.32 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.99 | 1.32 | 227% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.240 | 5.653 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.2M | 7.56B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 0.02 | 7,809% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.70 | 10.76 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.09 | 17.09 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.31 | 28.85 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.37 | 55.61 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement