Ad is loading...
GTAPX vs NLSIX
GTAPX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts GTAPX vs NLSIX
Glenmede Long/Short Eq Ptf
Price$13.32
Change+$0.08 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.75M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$18.85
Change+$0.18 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.13B
GTAPX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTAPX vs. NLSIX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTAPX is a Buy and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.13B vs. GTAPX (43.7M). GTAPX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: GTAPX (2.31) vs NLSIX (0.02). GTAPX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: GTAPX (19 years) vs NLSIX (13 years). GTAPX (2.99) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. GTAPX (0.99). GTAPX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: GTAPX (0) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.44 vs. GTAPX (-0.60). GTAPX return over 5 years is better than : 37.03 vs. NLSIX (31.07).
| GTAPX | NLSIX | GTAPX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.52 | 1.32 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.99 | 1.32 | 227% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.330 | -0.427 | -77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.7M | 7.13B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.31 | 0.02 | 10,547% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.60 | 5.44 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.82 | 11.78 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.03 | 31.07 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.10 | 42.90 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...