Ad is loading...
GTDCX vs RNWFX
GTDCX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts GTDCX vs RNWFX
Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap C
Price$32.19
Change-$0.02 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
American Funds New World R5
Price$79.57
Change+$0.26 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.54B
GTDCX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDCX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jan 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDCX is a StrongBuy and RNWFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 63.5B vs. GTDCX (1.38B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than GTDCX: RNWFX (1.51) vs GTDCX (0.70). GTDCX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: GTDCX (26 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. GTDCX (11.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDCX: RNWFX (250) vs GTDCX (1000). RNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.03 vs. GTDCX (2.36). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.40 vs. GTDCX (-14.64).
| GTDCX | RNWFX | GTDCX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.093 | 2.990 | -3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.38B | 63.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.51 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.36 | 8.03 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.21 | 2.01 | -507% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.64 | 15.40 | -95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.96 | 50.73 | 20% |