GTLB vs PATH
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTLB is a Buy and PATH is a StrongSell.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GTLB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePATH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GTLB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PATH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GTLB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PATH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GTLB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PATH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
GTLB (@Packaged Software) experienced а +6.79% price change this week, while PATH (@Packaged Software) price change was +4.13% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.22%.
Reported Earning Dates
GTLB is expected to report earnings on Sep 04, 2024.
PATH is expected to report earnings on Sep 05, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+1.87% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| GTLB | PATH | GTLB / PATH | |
| Capitalization | 9.25B | 12.9B | 72% |
| EBITDA | -180.9M | -142.12M | 127% |
| Gain YTD | -10.260 | -18.720 | 55% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 580M | 1.31B | 44% |
| Total Cash | 1.04B | 1.88B | 55% |
| Total Debt | 410K | 67.1M | 1% |
| GTLB | PATH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 82% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| UGA | 67.43 | 1.00 | +1.50% |
| United States Gasoline | |||
| XTJA | 26.11 | -0.01 | -0.05% |
| Innovator US Equity Acclrtd Pls ETF Jan | |||
| VTC | 75.81 | -0.11 | -0.14% |
| Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF | |||
| DJAN | 36.47 | -0.05 | -0.14% |
| FT Cboe Vest US Equity Dp Bffr ETF Jan | |||
| SCHF | 39.58 | -0.23 | -0.58% |
| Schwab International Equity ETF™ | |||
GTLB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTLB has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTLB jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GTLB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTLB | 100% | -1.05% | ||
| COIN - GTLB | 59% Loosely correlated | -9.43% | ||
| SMAR - GTLB | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| BRZE - GTLB | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.11% | ||
| ASAN - GTLB | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| INTU - GTLB | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
More | ||||
PATH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PATH has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PATH jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PATH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PATH | 100% | -2.65% | ||
| COIN - PATH | 67% Closely correlated | -9.43% | ||
| ASAN - PATH | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| U - PATH | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| IOT - PATH | 60% Loosely correlated | -3.42% | ||
| RIOT - PATH | 60% Loosely correlated | -3.66% | ||
More | ||||