GTLB
Price
$49.16
Change
-$0.37 (-0.75%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
9.25B
29 days until earnings call
SMAR
Price
$56.47
Change
+$0.01 (+0.02%)
Updated
Jan 21 closing price
Capitalization
5.29B
24 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GTLB vs SMAR

Header iconGTLB vs SMAR Comparison
Open Charts GTLB vs SMARBanner chart's image
GitLab
Price$49.16
Change-$0.37 (-0.75%)
Volume$2.09M
Capitalization9.25B
Smartsheet
Price$56.47
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
Volume$17.56M
Capitalization5.29B
GTLB vs SMAR Comparison Chart
Loading...
GTLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTLB vs. SMAR commentary
May 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTLB is a StrongBuy and SMAR is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 11, 2025
Stock price -- (GTLB: $49.16 vs. SMAR: $56.47)
Brand notoriety: GTLB and SMAR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTLB: 81% vs. SMAR: 100%
Market capitalization -- GTLB: $9.25B vs. SMAR: $5.29B
GTLB [@Packaged Software] is valued at $9.25B. SMAR’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $5.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTLB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMAR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GTLB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SMAR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GTLB and SMAR are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GTLB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GTLB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

GTLB (@Packaged Software) experienced а +5.61% price change this week, while SMAR (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

GTLB is expected to report earnings on Sep 09, 2025.

SMAR is expected to report earnings on Jun 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.19% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GTLB($9.25B) has a higher market cap than SMAR($5.29B). SMAR YTD gains are higher at: 0.785 vs. GTLB (-12.760). SMAR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -93.27M vs. GTLB (-180.9M). GTLB has more cash in the bank: 1.04B vs. SMAR (629M). GTLB has less debt than SMAR: GTLB (410K) vs SMAR (49.8M). SMAR has higher revenues than GTLB: SMAR (958M) vs GTLB (580M).
GTLBSMARGTLB / SMAR
Capitalization9.25B5.29B175%
EBITDA-180.9M-93.27M194%
Gain YTD-12.7600.785-1,625%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue580M958M61%
Total Cash1.04B629M165%
Total Debt410K49.8M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SMAR: Fundamental Ratings
SMAR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
83
SMR RATING
1..100
89
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTLB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GTLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSL11.810.66
+5.92%
GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF
BBEM54.220.36
+0.67%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Mkt EqETF
CIL47.860.20
+0.42%
VictoryShares International Vol Wtd ETF
SCHP26.480.03
+0.11%
Schwab US TIPS ETF™
UWM32.91-0.12
-0.36%
ProShares Ultra Russell2000

GTLB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTLB has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTLB jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTLB
1D Price
Change %
GTLB100%
-0.75%
COIN - GTLB
59%
Loosely correlated
-3.48%
BRZE - GTLB
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
MDB - GTLB
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
SNOW - GTLB
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
TEAM - GTLB
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
More