Advertisement
GTLB vs VFS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTLB is a Hold and VFS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GTLB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVFS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GTLB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- VFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GTLB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GTLB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- VFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
GTLB (@Packaged Software) experienced а -6.37% price change this week, while VFS (@Motor Vehicles) price change was -6.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.05%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -5.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.71%.
Reported Earning Dates
GTLB is expected to report earnings on Sep 09, 2025.
VFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 02, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-4.94% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Motor Vehicles (-5.58% weekly)Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.
| GTLB | VFS | GTLB / VFS | |
| Capitalization | 9.25B | 11.6B | 80% |
| EBITDA | -180.9M | -42.34T | 0% |
| Gain YTD | -22.254 | -15.012 | 148% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 580M | 22.64T | 0% |
| Total Cash | 1.04B | 3.16T | 0% |
| Total Debt | 410K | 73.22T | 0% |
| GTLB | VFS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 10 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ODDS | 32.55 | 0.35 | +1.08% |
| Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF | |||
| ACV | 22.65 | 0.08 | +0.35% |
| Virtus Diversified Income & Convertible Fund | |||
| AWF | 11.12 | 0.01 | +0.09% |
| ALLIANCEBERSTEIN GLOBAL HIGH Income FUND | |||
| CLOB | 50.85 | 0.04 | +0.07% |
| VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF | |||
| KGRN | 27.31 | -0.84 | -2.99% |
| KraneShares MSCI China Clean Tech ETF | |||
VFS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VFS has been loosely correlated with RIVN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VFS jumps, then RIVN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VFS | 100% | -0.15% | ||
| RIVN - VFS | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| TSLA - VFS | 32% Poorly correlated | -3.38% | ||
| LCID - VFS | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.60% | ||
| STLA - VFS | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.33% | ||
| WKHS - VFS | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.45% | ||
More | ||||