Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTLLX vs RGACX
GTLLX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts GTLLX vs RGACX
Glenmede Disciplined US Growth Eq Ptf
Price$28.85
Change-$0.18 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$79.35
Change-$0.06 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets320.87B
GTLLX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTLLX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTLLX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 321B vs. GTLLX (1.27B). RGACX pays higher dividends than GTLLX: RGACX (0.07) vs GTLLX (0.00). GTLLX was incepted earlier than RGACX: GTLLX (21 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than GTLLX (0.86). GTLLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). GTLLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: GTLLX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.78 vs. GTLLX (-17.76). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 42.55 vs. GTLLX (-8.20).
| GTLLX | RGACX | GTLLX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.94 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.94 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.369 | 10.307 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 321B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.76 | 8.78 | -202% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.17 | 52.65 | 10% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.20 | 42.55 | -19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.68 | 81.14 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement