Advertisement
GTLS vs PLYM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTLS is a Hold and PLYM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GTLS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePLYM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GTLS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PLYM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GTLS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLYM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GTLS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PLYM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
GTLS (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -1.51% price change this week, while PLYM (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -1.55% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.30%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.62%.
Reported Earning Dates
GTLS is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.
PLYM is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Machinery (-0.04% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.56% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
| GTLS | PLYM | GTLS / PLYM | |
| Capitalization | 6.76B | 979M | 691% |
| EBITDA | 561M | 143M | 392% |
| Gain YTD | -13.593 | -8.359 | 163% |
| P/E Ratio | 363.57 | 107.90 | 337% |
| Revenue | 3.35B | 200M | 1,676% |
| Total Cash | 188M | 14.5M | 1,297% |
| Total Debt | 3.9B | 873M | 447% |
GTLS | PLYM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 73 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GTLS's Valuation (50) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as PLYM (50) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that GTLS’s stock grew similarly to PLYM’s over the last 12 months.
GTLS's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as PLYM (73) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that GTLS’s stock grew similarly to PLYM’s over the last 12 months.
GTLS's SMR Rating (100) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as PLYM (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that GTLS’s stock grew similarly to PLYM’s over the last 12 months.
GTLS's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as PLYM (58) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that GTLS’s stock grew similarly to PLYM’s over the last 12 months.
GTLS's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as PLYM (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that GTLS’s stock grew similarly to PLYM’s over the last 12 months.
| GTLS | PLYM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 79% | 13 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 5 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 74% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JEMCX | 32.65 | N/A | N/A |
| JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity C | |||
| BSGRX | 13.66 | N/A | N/A |
| BlackRock Advantage Small Cap Gr R | |||
| PZVIX | 12.74 | N/A | N/A |
| Pzena International Small Cap Value Inv | |||
| MSPIX | 68.38 | -0.26 | -0.38% |
| NYLI S&P 500 Index Class I | |||
| BRZAX | 13.01 | -0.13 | -0.99% |
| BlackRock Sus Adg Intl Eq Inv A | |||
GTLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTLS has been closely correlated with FLS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GTLS jumps, then FLS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GTLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTLS | 100% | -0.90% | ||
| FLS - GTLS | 78% Closely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| ITT - GTLS | 74% Closely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| PH - GTLS | 70% Closely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| EMR - GTLS | 69% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| NPO - GTLS | 68% Closely correlated | -1.15% | ||
More | ||||
PLYM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLYM has been closely correlated with LXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PLYM jumps, then LXP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLYM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLYM | 100% | -1.49% | ||
| LXP - PLYM | 80% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| STAG - PLYM | 78% Closely correlated | -1.47% | ||
| EGP - PLYM | 77% Closely correlated | -2.35% | ||
| FR - PLYM | 73% Closely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| PLD - PLYM | 72% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
More | ||||