GTX
Price
$9.88
Change
+$0.13 (+1.33%)
Updated
Feb 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.37B
61 days until earnings call
MGA
Price
$38.05
Change
-$0.70 (-1.81%)
Updated
Feb 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.65B
69 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GTX vs MGA

Header iconGTX vs MGA Comparison
Open Charts GTX vs MGABanner chart's image
Garrett Motion
Price$9.88
Change+$0.13 (+1.33%)
Volume$31.81K
Capitalization2.37B
Magna International
Price$38.05
Change-$0.70 (-1.81%)
Volume$11.28K
Capitalization15.65B
GTX vs MGA Comparison Chart
Loading...
GTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTX vs. MGA commentary
Feb 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTX is a Hold and MGA is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 22, 2025
Stock price -- (GTX: $9.75 vs. MGA: $38.76)
Brand notoriety: GTX and MGA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTX: 203% vs. MGA: 89%
Market capitalization -- GTX: $2.37B vs. MGA: $15.65B
GTX [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $2.37B. MGA’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $15.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GTX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GTX is a better buy in the long-term than MGA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GTX’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GTX’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MGA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both GTX and MGA are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

GTX (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +7.14% price change this week, while MGA (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -2.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

GTX is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

MGA is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.30% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGA($15.7B) has a higher market cap than GTX($2.37B). MGA has higher P/E ratio than GTX: MGA (12.61) vs GTX (10.19). GTX YTD gains are higher at: 8.669 vs. MGA (-7.251). MGA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.6B vs. GTX (600M). MGA has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. GTX (259M). GTX has less debt than MGA: GTX (1.69B) vs MGA (7.22B). MGA has higher revenues than GTX: MGA (42.8B) vs GTX (3.89B).
GTXMGAGTX / MGA
Capitalization2.37B15.7B15%
EBITDA600M3.6B17%
Gain YTD8.669-7.251-120%
P/E Ratio10.1912.6181%
Revenue3.89B42.8B9%
Total Cash259M1.2B22%
Total Debt1.69B7.22B23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GTX vs MGA: Fundamental Ratings
GTX
MGA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7316
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
86100
SMR RATING
1..100
10072
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5079
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
973
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGA's Valuation (7) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GTX (44) in the null industry. This means that MGA’s stock grew somewhat faster than GTX’s over the last 12 months.

GTX's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as MGA (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that GTX’s stock grew similarly to MGA’s over the last 12 months.

MGA's SMR Rating (72) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as GTX (100) in the null industry. This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to GTX’s over the last 12 months.

GTX's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as MGA (79) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that GTX’s stock grew similarly to MGA’s over the last 12 months.

GTX's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGA (73) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that GTX’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTXMGA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SSPIX98.66N/A
N/A
SEI S&P 500 Index F (SIMT)
GRESX11.81N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Real Estate Securities Svc
TEIHX42.97N/A
N/A
Nuveen Equity Index I
MMNBX10.21N/A
N/A
MassMutual Diversified Value Y
JIGCX48.07-0.02
-0.04%
Janus Henderson Overseas C