Compare trend and price GUSH vs MUR
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GUSH is a Hold and MUR is a Buy.
MUR | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 37 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 28 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 6 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GUSH | MUR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | 8 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MEM | 29.00 | 0.10 | +0.33% |
| Matthews Emerging Markets Eq Actv ETF | |||
| NJUL | 57.13 | 0.13 | +0.23% |
| Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Bfr ETF Jul | |||
| PFFL | 9.61 | N/A | +0.05% |
| ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Lvrgd Pref Stk ETN | |||
| AGZ | 106.79 | -0.06 | -0.06% |
| iShares Agency Bond ETF | |||
| BBCA | 65.12 | -0.58 | -0.88% |
| JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF | |||
GUSH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GUSH has been closely correlated with MRO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GUSH jumps, then MRO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GUSH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GUSH | 100% | +0.95% | ||
| MRO - GUSH | 92% Closely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| MUR - GUSH | 90% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| MTDR - GUSH | 89% Closely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| MGY - GUSH | 89% Closely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| OVV - GUSH | 88% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
More | ||||
MUR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MUR has been closely correlated with MRO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MUR jumps, then MRO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MUR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MUR | 100% | +0.13% | ||
| MRO - MUR | 87% Closely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| SM - MUR | 85% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| MTDR - MUR | 84% Closely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| CHRD - MUR | 82% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| APA - MUR | 82% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
More | ||||