Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
GVIP vs QQQM
GVIP vs QQQM Comparison
Open Charts GVIP vs QQQM
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
Price$127.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.79K
CapitalizationN/A
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Price$208.18
Change+$0.30 (+0.14%)
Volume$1.6M
CapitalizationN/A
GVIP vs QQQM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GVIP vs. QQQM commentary
Nov 23, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GVIP is a Buy and QQQM is a StrongSell.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QQQM has more net assets: 36.3B vs. GVIP (400M). GVIP has a higher annual dividend yield than QQQM: GVIP (33.203) vs QQQM (24.147). GVIP was incepted earlier than QQQM: GVIP (8 years) vs QQQM (4 years). GVIP has a higher turnover QQQM (27.00) vs QQQM (27.00).
| GVIP | QQQM | GVIP / QQQM | |
| Gain YTD | 33.203 | 24.147 | 138% |
| Net Assets | 400M | 36.3B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 120.00 | 27.00 | 444% |
| Yield | 0.68 | 0.65 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GVIP | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 77% | 8 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GVIP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GVIP has been closely correlated with VRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GVIP jumps, then VRT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GVIP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GVIP | 100% | +0.44% | ||
| VRT - GVIP | 71% Closely correlated | -0.95% | ||
| APG - GVIP | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| UBER - GVIP | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.69% | ||
| WSC - GVIP | 47% Loosely correlated | +2.43% | ||
| ET - GVIP | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
More | ||||
QQQM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QQQM has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QQQM jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QQQM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQQM | 100% | +0.14% | ||
| CDNS - QQQM | 80% Closely correlated | +1.75% | ||
| LRCX - QQQM | 79% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| KLAC - QQQM | 78% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| SNPS - QQQM | 78% Closely correlated | +1.28% | ||
| AMAT - QQQM | 77% Closely correlated | -0.50% | ||
More | ||||