Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GWLRX vs RNWBX
GWLRX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GWLRX vs RNWBX
abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China R
Price$11.33
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets149.26M
American Funds New World R2
Price$80.17
Change+$0.10 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.25B
GWLRX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GWLRX vs. RNWBX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GWLRX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 66.2B vs. GWLRX (149M). GWLRX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GWLRX (0.27) vs RNWBX (0.14). GWLRX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GWLRX (22 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). GWLRX (1.99) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GWLRX (35.00). GWLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: GWLRX (0) vs RNWBX (250). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.51 vs. GWLRX (-0.44). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.74 vs. GWLRX (1.70).
| GWLRX | RNWBX | GWLRX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 1.67 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 1.67 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.755 | 9.001 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 149M | 66.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 0.14 | 190% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.44 | 4.51 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.19 | 24.28 | -34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.70 | 35.74 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.90 | 48.41 | -20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement