GWOX vs YLWDF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GWOX is a Hold and YLWDF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GWOX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileYLWDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- GWOX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- YLWDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Price Growth
GWOX (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) experienced а -4.52% price change this week, while YLWDF (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) price change was -1.11% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was +1.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.95%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Publishing: Books/Magazines (+1.76% weekly)The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.
| GWOX | YLWDF | GWOX / YLWDF | |
| Capitalization | 36M | 100M | 36% |
| EBITDA | 24M | 77.1M | 31% |
| Gain YTD | 18.230 | -16.752 | -109% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 3.65 | - |
| Revenue | 24M | 239M | 10% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 25.2M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 43.9M | - |
GWOX | YLWDF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 86 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 7 Undervalued | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 81 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 20 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 48 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
YLWDF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as GWOX (7). This means that YLWDF’s stock grew similarly to GWOX’s over the last 12 months.
YLWDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as GWOX (100). This means that YLWDF’s stock grew similarly to GWOX’s over the last 12 months.
YLWDF's SMR Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GWOX (100). This means that YLWDF’s stock grew significantly faster than GWOX’s over the last 12 months.
GWOX's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as YLWDF (60). This means that GWOX’s stock grew similarly to YLWDF’s over the last 12 months.
YLWDF's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GWOX (100). This means that YLWDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GWOX’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
GWOX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GWOX and IFPJF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GWOX and IFPJF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GWOX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GWOX | 100% | -4.52% | ||
| IFPJF - GWOX | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SBSNY - GWOX | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.62% | ||
| YLWDF - GWOX | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.72% | ||
| IFJPY - GWOX | 3% Poorly correlated | -1.39% | ||
| DTRL - GWOX | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
YLWDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that YLWDF and DTRL have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YLWDF and DTRL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To YLWDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YLWDF | 100% | +1.72% | ||
| DTRL - YLWDF | 15% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GWOX - YLWDF | 4% Poorly correlated | -4.52% | ||
| SBSNY - YLWDF | 2% Poorly correlated | -1.62% | ||
| PSORF - YLWDF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| STRYF - YLWDF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||