Ad is loading...
GWPDX vs MNHCX
GWPDX vs MNHCX Comparison
Open Charts GWPDX vs MNHCX
American Funds Growth Portfolio F3
Price$23.67
Change+$1.96 (+9.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.55B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term L
Price$23.65
Change+$1.64 (+7.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets399.12M
GWPDX vs MNHCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GWPDX vs. MNHCX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GWPDX is a Hold and MNHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GWPDX has more cash in the bank: 17.6B vs. MNHCX (399M). GWPDX pays higher dividends than MNHCX: GWPDX (0.80) vs MNHCX (0.21). GWPDX was incepted earlier than MNHCX: GWPDX (8 years) vs MNHCX (15 years). MNHCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than GWPDX (0.38). MNHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GWPDX: MNHCX (2000) vs GWPDX (1000000). MNHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.46 vs. GWPDX (-11.13). GWPDX return over 5 years is better than : 35.06 vs. MNHCX (-1.17).
| GWPDX | MNHCX | GWPDX / MNHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 1.86 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 1.88 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.762 | -11.748 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.6B | 399M | 4,411% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.21 | 383% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.13 | -10.46 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.86 | -16.30 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.06 | -1.17 | -3,006% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -24.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...