Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GWPDX vs NMFAX
GWPDX vs NMFAX Comparison
Open Charts GWPDX vs NMFAX
American Funds Growth Portfolio F3
Price$27.80
Change+$0.29 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.34B
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Core A
Price$15.26
Change+$0.13 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.4B
GWPDX vs NMFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GWPDX vs. NMFAX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GWPDX is a Hold and NMFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GWPDX has more cash in the bank: 22.3B vs. NMFAX (1.41B). NMFAX pays higher dividends than GWPDX: NMFAX (0.98) vs GWPDX (0.74). GWPDX was incepted earlier than NMFAX: GWPDX (8 years) vs NMFAX (27 years). NMFAX (0.87) is less costly to investors than GWPDX (0.38). NMFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GWPDX: NMFAX (2000) vs GWPDX (1000000). GWPDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.74 vs. NMFAX (6.66). NMFAX return over 5 years is better than : 72.18 vs. GWPDX (52.09).
| GWPDX | NMFAX | GWPDX / NMFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.84 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.87 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.148 | 3.951 | 232% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.3B | 1.41B | 1,587% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.98 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.74 | 6.66 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.08 | 49.71 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.09 | 72.18 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 48.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement