H
Price
$165.85
Change
+$0.46 (+0.28%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
15.63B
52 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MAR
Price
$336.51
Change
+$0.44 (+0.13%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
87.75B
52 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

H vs MAR

H vs MAR Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
H vs. MAR commentary
Sep 08, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is H is a StrongBuy and MAR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2026
Stock price -- (H: $165.85 vs. MAR: $336.51)
Brand notoriety: H: Not notable vs. MAR: Notable
Both companies represent the Cable/Satellite TV industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: H: 81% vs. MAR: 80%
Market capitalization -- H: $15.63B vs. MAR: $87.75B
H [@Cable/Satellite TV] is valued at $15.63B. MAR’s [@Cable/Satellite TV] market capitalization is $87.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Cable/Satellite TV] industry ranges from $87.75B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Cable/Satellite TV] industry is $20.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

H’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMAR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • H’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MAR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAR is a better buy in the long-term than H.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

H’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • H’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MAR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAR is a better buy in the short-term than H.

Price Growth

H (@Cable/Satellite TV) experienced а -3.72% price change this week, while MAR (@Cable/Satellite TV) price change was -4.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Cable/Satellite TV industry was -2.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

H is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

MAR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Cable/Satellite TV (-2.46% weekly)

Companies that operate paid and subscriber-based broadcast facilities for cable and home satellite systems. Comcast Corp, Charter Communications, Inc. and DISH Network Corporation are some of the biggest cable/satellite TV providers. Customers typically pay a regular monthly fee to cable TV operators for unlimited access to a certain package of channels. Since the rising popularity of online streaming services have increased instances of cord-cutting among consumers, several cable operators have also diversified into internet services to milk the burgeoning appetite for internet-based content.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAR($87.8B) has a higher market cap than H($15.6B). H has higher P/E ratio than MAR: H (204.75) vs MAR (34.84). MAR YTD gains are higher at: 9.113 vs. H (3.717). MAR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.03B vs. H (882M). H has more cash in the bank: 606M vs. MAR (462M). H has less debt than MAR: H (4.51B) vs MAR (17.8B). MAR has higher revenues than H: MAR (26.9B) vs H (7.15B).
HMARH / MAR
Capitalization15.6B87.8B18%
EBITDA882M5.03B18%
Gain YTD3.7179.11341%
P/E Ratio204.7534.84588%
Revenue7.15B26.9B27%
Total Cash606M462M131%
Total Debt4.51B17.8B25%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
H vs MAR: Fundamental Ratings
H
MAR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3218
SMR RATING
1..100
885
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6059
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
229
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2850

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

H's Valuation (87) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as MAR (97). This means that H’s stock grew similarly to MAR’s over the last 12 months.

MAR's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as H (32). This means that MAR’s stock grew similarly to H’s over the last 12 months.

MAR's SMR Rating (5) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for H (88). This means that MAR’s stock grew significantly faster than H’s over the last 12 months.

MAR's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as H (60). This means that MAR’s stock grew similarly to H’s over the last 12 months.

H's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as MAR (29). This means that H’s stock grew similarly to MAR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HMAR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
H
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MAR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RMBI16.010.15
+0.95%
Richmond Mutual Bancorporation
TEO13.030.06
+0.46%
Telecom Argentina SA
ODC87.90-1.24
-1.39%
Oil-Dri Corporation Of America
MCK907.99-13.39
-1.45%
McKesson Corp
PTN12.70-0.38
-2.91%
Palatin Technologies

H and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, H has been closely correlated with HLT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if H jumps, then HLT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To H
1D Price
Change %
H100%
+0.28%
HLT - H
75%
Closely correlated
-1.01%
MAR - H
75%
Closely correlated
+0.13%
IHG - H
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
WH - H
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
CHH - H
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.23%
More

MAR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAR has been closely correlated with HLT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAR jumps, then HLT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAR
1D Price
Change %
MAR100%
+0.13%
HLT - MAR
82%
Closely correlated
-1.01%
H - MAR
74%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
IHG - MAR
73%
Closely correlated
-0.51%
ATAT - MAR
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
CVEO - MAR
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
More