HAFC
Price
$20.99
Change
-$1.63 (-7.21%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
469.44M
25 days until earnings call
NBTB
Price
$39.65
Change
-$3.25 (-7.58%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.7B
24 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HAFC vs NBTB

Header iconHAFC vs NBTB Comparison
Open Charts HAFC vs NBTBBanner chart's image
Hanmi Financial
Price$20.99
Change-$1.63 (-7.21%)
Volume$423.64K
Capitalization469.44M
NBT Ban
Price$39.65
Change-$3.25 (-7.58%)
Volume$327.84K
Capitalization1.7B
HAFC vs NBTB Comparison Chart
Loading...
HAFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBTB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HAFC vs. NBTB commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAFC is a StrongBuy and NBTB is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (HAFC: $20.99 vs. NBTB: $39.65)
Brand notoriety: HAFC and NBTB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HAFC: 218% vs. NBTB: 148%
Market capitalization -- HAFC: $469.44M vs. NBTB: $1.7B
HAFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $469.44M. NBTB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HAFC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNBTB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HAFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NBTB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HAFC is a better buy in the long-term than NBTB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HAFC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NBTB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HAFC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NBTB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NBTB is a better buy in the short-term than HAFC.

Price Growth

HAFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -8.18% price change this week, while NBTB (@Regional Banks) price change was -8.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

HAFC is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

NBTB is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-3.56% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBTB($1.7B) has a higher market cap than HAFC($469M). NBTB has higher P/E ratio than HAFC: NBTB (13.58) vs HAFC (5.92). HAFC YTD gains are higher at: -10.148 vs. NBTB (-16.385). NBTB has more cash in the bank: 213M vs. HAFC (78.8M). HAFC has less debt than NBTB: HAFC (455M) vs NBTB (544M). NBTB has higher revenues than HAFC: NBTB (518M) vs HAFC (250M).
HAFCNBTBHAFC / NBTB
Capitalization469M1.7B28%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-10.148-16.38562%
P/E Ratio5.9213.5844%
Revenue250M518M48%
Total Cash78.8M213M37%
Total Debt455M544M84%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HAFC vs NBTB: Fundamental Ratings
HAFC
NBTB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1154
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3536
SMR RATING
1..100
2114
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4558
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
841
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HAFC's Valuation (44) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NBTB (78). This means that HAFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NBTB’s over the last 12 months.

HAFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NBTB (36). This means that HAFC’s stock grew similarly to NBTB’s over the last 12 months.

NBTB's SMR Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HAFC (21). This means that NBTB’s stock grew similarly to HAFC’s over the last 12 months.

HAFC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NBTB (58). This means that HAFC’s stock grew similarly to NBTB’s over the last 12 months.

HAFC's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NBTB (41). This means that HAFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NBTB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HAFCNBTB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HAFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBTB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VMACX56.27N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core A
BIRAX20.26N/A
N/A
BlackRock Sustainable Adg Lg Cp Cr A
SGZFX51.39N/A
N/A
Saturna Growth Z
FMKFX18.91N/A
N/A
Fidelity Magellan K6
FFGGX36.63-0.68
-1.82%
American Funds Global Balanced 529-F-2