HBCP
Price
$71.34
Change
+$0.48 (+0.68%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
561.31M
79 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SFBC
Price
$47.23
Change
+$1.34 (+2.92%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
112.45M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HBCP vs SFBC

HBCP vs SFBC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HBCP vs. SFBC commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBCP is a StrongBuy and SFBC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (HBCP: $71.34 vs. SFBC: $47.23)
Brand notoriety: HBCP and SFBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HBCP: 49% vs. SFBC: 16%
Market capitalization -- HBCP: $561.31M vs. SFBC: $112.45M
HBCP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $561.31M. SFBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $112.45M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HBCP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSFBC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HBCP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SFBC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HBCP is a better buy in the long-term than SFBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HBCP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFBC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HBCP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SFBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both HBCP and SFBC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

HBCP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.61% price change this week, while SFBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

HBCP is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBCP($561M) has a higher market cap than SFBC($112M). SFBC has higher P/E ratio than HBCP: SFBC (14.54) vs HBCP (11.93). HBCP YTD gains are higher at: 24.646 vs. SFBC (9.313). SFBC has less debt than HBCP: SFBC (21.2M) vs HBCP (54.7M). HBCP has higher revenues than SFBC: HBCP (151M) vs SFBC (39.6M).
HBCPSFBCHBCP / SFBC
Capitalization561M112M501%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD24.6469.313265%
P/E Ratio11.9314.5482%
Revenue151M39.6M381%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt54.7M21.2M258%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HBCP vs SFBC: Fundamental Ratings
HBCP
SFBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2850
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1470
SMR RATING
1..100
5979
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4346
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3274
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SFBC's Valuation (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HBCP (54) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that SFBC’s stock grew similarly to HBCP’s over the last 12 months.

HBCP's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFBC (70) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HBCP’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFBC’s over the last 12 months.

HBCP's SMR Rating (59) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SFBC (79) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HBCP’s stock grew similarly to SFBC’s over the last 12 months.

HBCP's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SFBC (46) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HBCP’s stock grew similarly to SFBC’s over the last 12 months.

HBCP's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFBC (74) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HBCP’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HBCPSFBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
34%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HBCP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SFBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MVISX61.040.91
+1.51%
Patient Opportunity IS
HFQDX8.26N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income D
HDVIX16.82-0.01
-0.06%
Hartford International Equity I
RYCUX46.51-0.34
-0.73%
Rydex Utilities C
TNVIX22.10-0.20
-0.88%
1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value I

HBCP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBCP has been closely correlated with UVSP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBCP jumps, then UVSP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBCP
1D Price
Change %
HBCP100%
+0.68%
UVSP - HBCP
83%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
SRCE - HBCP
82%
Closely correlated
N/A
GSBC - HBCP
82%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
FBIZ - HBCP
82%
Closely correlated
+4.39%
TRMK - HBCP
81%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
More