SFBC
Price
$39.35
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 17, 6:59 PM EST
68 days until earnings call
TCBC
Price
$13.75
Change
+$0.01 (+0.07%)
Updated
May 17, 6:59 PM EST
Ad is loading...

SFBC vs TCBC

Header iconSFBC vs TCBC Comparison
Open Charts SFBC vs TCBCBanner chart's image
Sound Financial Ban
Price$39.35
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$487
CapitalizationN/A
TC Bancshares
Price$13.75
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
Volume$7.49K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
SFBC vs TCBC Comparison Chart

Loading...

VS
SFBC vs. TCBC commentary
May 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFBC is a Hold and TCBC is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
May 19, 2024
Stock price -- (SFBC: $39.35 vs. TCBC: $13.75)
Brand notoriety: SFBC and TCBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SFBC: 120% vs. TCBC: 156%
Market capitalization -- SFBC: $104.11M vs. TCBC: $55.59M
SFBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $104.11M. TCBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $55.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SFBC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTCBC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SFBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TCBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SFBC is a better buy in the long-term than TCBC.

Price Growth

SFBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.25% price change this week, while TCBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

SFBC is expected to report earnings on Jul 26, 2024.

TCBC is expected to report earnings on May 10, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.22% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for SFBC with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for TCBC with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFBC($104M) has a higher market cap than TCBC($55.6M). TCBC has higher P/E ratio than SFBC: TCBC (232.33) vs SFBC (14.23). SFBC YTD gains are higher at: 1.391 vs. TCBC (-0.073). TCBC has less debt than SFBC: TCBC (13.1M) vs SFBC (56.5M). SFBC has higher revenues than TCBC: SFBC (38.9M) vs TCBC (15.1M).
SFBCTCBCSFBC / TCBC
Capitalization104M55.6M187%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.391-0.073-1,916%
P/E Ratio14.23232.336%
Revenue38.9M15.1M258%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt56.5M13.1M431%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SFBC: Fundamental Ratings
SFBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
62
SMR RATING
1..100
59
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
21
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BGORX19.230.09
+0.47%
BlackRock Advantage International R
TRSPX57.700.07
+0.12%
Nuveen S&P 500 Index Retire
SNWIX61.020.07
+0.11%
Easterly Snow Small Cap Value I
GMXIX17.580.01
+0.06%
Nationwide Mid Cap Market Idx R6
MPGSX11.18-0.01
-0.09%
MassMutual Disciplined Gr R5

SFBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SFBC and PBHC have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFBC and PBHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFBC
1D Price
Change %
SFBC100%
+0.13%
PBHC - SFBC
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
OPOF - SFBC
26%
Poorly correlated
+4.73%
TCBC - SFBC
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
ITCLY - SFBC
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRBS - SFBC
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.14%
More

TCBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TCBC has been loosely correlated with AFBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TCBC jumps, then AFBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TCBC
1D Price
Change %
TCBC100%
-1.56%
AFBI - TCBC
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SBCF - TCBC
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
EBC - TCBC
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
CLST - TCBC
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
MCB - TCBC
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
More