Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLCX vs HBLFX
HBLCX vs HBLFX Comparison
Open Charts HBLCX vs HBLFX
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.25
Change+$0.03 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.74B
Hartford Balanced Income F
Price$14.55
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.74B
HBLCX vs HBLFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLCX vs. HBLFX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLCX is a StrongBuy and HBLFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX (11.7B) and HBLFX (11.7B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . HBLFX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: HBLFX (3.68) vs HBLCX (2.65). HBLCX was incepted earlier than HBLFX: HBLCX (19 years) vs HBLFX (8 years). HBLCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than HBLFX (0.56). HBLCX (61.00) and HBLFX (61.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLFX: HBLCX (2000) vs HBLFX (1000000). HBLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.92 vs. HBLCX (2.68). HBLFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.81 vs. HBLCX (7.98).
| HBLCX | HBLFX | HBLCX / HBLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.56 | 293% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.56 | 293% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.864 | 3.455 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 11.7B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.65 | 3.68 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.68 | 3.92 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.83 | 8.53 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.98 | 13.81 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.35 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement