Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLRX vs WBALX
HBLRX vs WBALX Comparison
Open Charts HBLRX vs WBALX
HBLRX vs WBALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLRX vs. WBALX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLRX is a Hold and WBALX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. WBALX (161M). HBLRX pays higher dividends than WBALX: HBLRX (2.74) vs WBALX (2.02). HBLRX was incepted earlier than WBALX: HBLRX (16 years) vs WBALX (23 years). HBLRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than WBALX (1.03). HBLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. WBALX (18.00). HBLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBALX: HBLRX (0) vs WBALX (2500). HBLRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.24 vs. WBALX (-1.22). HBLRX return over 5 years is better than : 3.87 vs. WBALX (2.98).
| HBLRX | WBALX | HBLRX / WBALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.85 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.03 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.305 | 0.666 | 796% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 161M | 6,832% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.74 | 2.02 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.24 | -1.22 | -267% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.33 | 8.23 | 247% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.87 | 2.98 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.95 | 39.09 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement