Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLSX vs MACFX
HBLSX vs MACFX Comparison
Open Charts HBLSX vs MACFX
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$14.78
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.82B
MFS Conservative Allocation A
Price$17.03
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.67B
HBLSX vs MACFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLSX vs. MACFX commentary
Jul 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLSX is a StrongBuy and MACFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. MACFX (3.67B). HBLSX pays higher dividends than MACFX: HBLSX (3.24) vs MACFX (2.92). HBLSX was incepted earlier than MACFX: HBLSX (15 years) vs MACFX (23 years). HBLSX (0.96) is less costly to investors than MACFX (0.83). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. MACFX (3.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than MACFX: HBLSX (0) vs MACFX (1000). MACFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.42 vs. HBLSX (3.07). MACFX return over 5 years is better than : 16.64 vs. HBLSX (14.19).
| HBLSX | MACFX | HBLSX / MACFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.83 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.83 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.383 | 5.611 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 11.8B | 3.67B | 322% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.24 | 2.92 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.07 | 3.42 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.71 | 16.58 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.19 | 16.64 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.92 | 40.83 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers