Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLVX vs WBALX
HBLVX vs WBALX Comparison
Open Charts HBLVX vs WBALX
Hartford Balanced Income R6
Price$14.93
Change-$0.08 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.95B
Weitz Conservative Allocation-Inv Cl
Price$17.01
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets233.73M
HBLVX vs WBALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLVX vs. WBALX commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLVX is a Buy and WBALX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLVX has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. WBALX (234M). HBLVX pays higher dividends than WBALX: HBLVX (3.61) vs WBALX (2.00). HBLVX was incepted earlier than WBALX: HBLVX (11 years) vs WBALX (22 years). WBALX (1.02) is less costly to investors than HBLVX (0.56). HBLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. WBALX (25.00). HBLVX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBALX: HBLVX (0) vs WBALX (2500). HBLVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.38 vs. WBALX (1.79). WBALX return over 5 years is better than : 23.10 vs. HBLVX (19.29).
| HBLVX | WBALX | HBLVX / WBALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.85 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.02 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.695 | 1.677 | 340% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12B | 234M | 5,128% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.61 | 2.00 | 180% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.38 | 1.79 | 357% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.20 | 15.33 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.29 | 23.10 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.02 | 38.49 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement