It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HBM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTGB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HBM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
HBM (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -10.78% price change this week, while TGB (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -4.27% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.13%.
HBM is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
TGB is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.
The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
HBM | TGB | HBM / TGB | |
Capitalization | 2.45B | 626M | 391% |
EBITDA | 621M | 125M | 497% |
Gain YTD | 51.449 | 44.286 | 116% |
P/E Ratio | 31.73 | 10.57 | 300% |
Revenue | 1.69B | 472M | 358% |
Total Cash | 251M | 83.5M | 301% |
Total Debt | 1.38B | 707M | 195% |
HBM | TGB | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 35 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 84 | 65 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 95 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HBM's Valuation (76) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as TGB (78) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that HBM’s stock grew similarly to TGB’s over the last 12 months.
TGB's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as HBM (39) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that TGB’s stock grew similarly to HBM’s over the last 12 months.
TGB's SMR Rating (65) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as HBM (84) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that TGB’s stock grew similarly to HBM’s over the last 12 months.
HBM's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as TGB (54) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that HBM’s stock grew similarly to TGB’s over the last 12 months.
TGB's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as HBM (98) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that TGB’s stock grew similarly to HBM’s over the last 12 months.
HBM | TGB | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago73% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago78% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago83% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago79% | 8 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 3 days ago80% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago83% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago78% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBM has been closely correlated with LUNMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBM jumps, then LUNMF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HBM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HBM | 100% | -2.56% | ||
LUNMF - HBM | 81% Closely correlated | -2.04% | ||
SCCO - HBM | 80% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
FCX - HBM | 80% Closely correlated | -0.29% | ||
TGB - HBM | 77% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
TECK - HBM | 77% Closely correlated | -1.52% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGB has been closely correlated with HBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TGB jumps, then HBM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TGB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TGB | 100% | N/A | ||
HBM - TGB | 77% Closely correlated | -2.56% | ||
FCX - TGB | 74% Closely correlated | -0.29% | ||
SCCO - TGB | 74% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
TECK - TGB | 70% Closely correlated | -1.52% | ||
LUNMF - TGB | 69% Closely correlated | -2.04% | ||
More |