It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HBM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileXPL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HBM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XPL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
HBM (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +9.16% price change this week, while XPL (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +3.10% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +9.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.45%.
HBM is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.
XPL is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.
The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
HBM | XPL | HBM / XPL | |
Capitalization | 2.45B | 48.2M | 5,077% |
EBITDA | 621M | -4.05M | -15,337% |
Gain YTD | -14.691 | 2.220 | -662% |
P/E Ratio | 31.73 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 1.69B | 0 | - |
Total Cash | 251M | 9.67M | 2,596% |
Total Debt | 1.38B | 89K | 1,548,315% |
HBM | XPL | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 40 | 55 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 84 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
XPL's Valuation (53) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as HBM (72). This means that XPL’s stock grew similarly to HBM’s over the last 12 months.
HBM's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as XPL (55). This means that HBM’s stock grew similarly to XPL’s over the last 12 months.
HBM's SMR Rating (84) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as XPL (92). This means that HBM’s stock grew similarly to XPL’s over the last 12 months.
XPL's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as HBM (77). This means that XPL’s stock grew similarly to HBM’s over the last 12 months.
HBM's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XPL (100). This means that HBM’s stock grew somewhat faster than XPL’s over the last 12 months.
HBM | XPL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 6 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago81% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago65% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago70% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago77% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago81% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago76% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago74% | 12 days ago80% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago82% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago82% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBM has been closely correlated with SCCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBM jumps, then SCCO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HBM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HBM | 100% | +0.14% | ||
SCCO - HBM | 81% Closely correlated | +3.59% | ||
LUNMF - HBM | 81% Closely correlated | +4.54% | ||
TECK - HBM | 81% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
TGB - HBM | 81% Closely correlated | +5.56% | ||
FCX - HBM | 80% Closely correlated | +1.20% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that XPL and FCX have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XPL and FCX's prices will move in lockstep.