Ad is loading...
HBMCX vs TRQZX
HBMCX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts HBMCX vs TRQZX
Hartford MidCap HLS IB
Price$26.13
Change-$0.13 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$110.49
Change-$0.77 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBMCX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 31.4B vs. HBMCX (861M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than HBMCX: TRQZX (0.68) vs HBMCX (0.00). HBMCX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: HBMCX (25 years) vs TRQZX (5 years). HBMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. TRQZX (21.70). HBMCX (0) and TRQZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.59 vs. HBMCX (13.71).
| HBMCX | TRQZX | HBMCX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.951 | 9.624 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 861M | 31.4B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.68 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.71 | 15.59 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | -29.89 | -12.38 | 241% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.92 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | -26.29 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VRP | 24.63 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF | |||
| QSWN | 22.15 | -0.04 | -0.16% |
| Amplify BlackSwan Tech & Treasury ETF | |||
| PSFF | 28.58 | -0.05 | -0.17% |
| Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF | |||
| GFGF | 30.07 | -0.08 | -0.25% |
| Guru Favorite Stocks ETF | |||
| AAPU | 36.96 | -0.16 | -0.43% |
| Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X Shares | |||