Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
HBMCX vs TRQZX
HBMCX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts HBMCX vs TRQZX
Hartford MidCap HLS IB
Price$26.91
Change-$0.37 (-1.36%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$111.06
Change-$2.19 (-1.93%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
HBMCX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 31B vs. HBMCX (862M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than HBMCX: TRQZX (0.68) vs HBMCX (0.00). HBMCX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: HBMCX (25 years) vs TRQZX (5 years). HBMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. TRQZX (21.70). HBMCX (0) and TRQZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HBMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.29 vs. TRQZX (15.06).
| HBMCX | TRQZX | HBMCX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.994 | 10.190 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 862M | 31B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.68 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.29 | 15.06 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | -32.61 | -17.37 | 188% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.96 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | -26.38 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| KPOP | 13.25 | 0.57 | +4.51% |
| JAKOTA K-Pop and Korean EntertainmentETF | |||
| RFDI | 62.88 | 0.17 | +0.27% |
| First Trust RiverFront Dyn Dev Intl ETF | |||
| XOMO | 16.77 | -0.10 | -0.62% |
| YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
| RWJ | 46.86 | -0.37 | -0.78% |
| Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF | |||
| QVAL | 45.50 | -0.65 | -1.41% |
| Alpha Architect US Quantitative Val ETF | |||