HCI
Price
$149.23
Change
-$0.20 (-0.13%)
Updated
Jun 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.16B
44 days until earnings call
RMBS
Price
$62.30
Change
+$2.30 (+3.83%)
Updated
Jun 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.38B
41 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HCI vs RMBS

Header iconHCI vs RMBS Comparison
Open Charts HCI vs RMBSBanner chart's image
HCI Group
Price$149.23
Change-$0.20 (-0.13%)
Volume$500
Capitalization1.16B
Rambus
Price$62.30
Change+$2.30 (+3.83%)
Volume$17.4K
Capitalization6.38B
HCI vs RMBS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HCI vs. RMBS commentary
Jun 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCI is a Hold and RMBS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 25, 2025
Stock price -- (HCI: $149.43 vs. RMBS: $60.00)
Brand notoriety: HCI and RMBS are both not notable
HCI represents the Property/Casualty Insurance, while RMBS is part of the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HCI: 140% vs. RMBS: 67%
Market capitalization -- HCI: $1.16B vs. RMBS: $6.38B
HCI [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $1.16B. RMBS’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $6.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $3.51T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.95B. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $55.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HCI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRMBS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HCI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RMBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HCI and RMBS are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HCI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMBS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HCI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RMBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMBS is a better buy in the short-term than HCI.

Price Growth

HCI (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -3.43% price change this week, while RMBS (@Semiconductors) price change was -0.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.13%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +2.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

HCI is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

RMBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.93% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

@Semiconductors (+2.87% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMBS($6.38B) has a higher market cap than HCI($1.16B). RMBS has higher P/E ratio than HCI: RMBS (31.41) vs HCI (15.12). HCI YTD gains are higher at: 28.984 vs. RMBS (13.507). HCI has more cash in the bank: 771M vs. RMBS (514M). RMBS has less debt than HCI: RMBS (29.2M) vs HCI (210M). RMBS has higher revenues than HCI: RMBS (605M) vs HCI (550M).
HCIRMBSHCI / RMBS
Capitalization1.16B6.38B18%
EBITDAN/A276M-
Gain YTD28.98413.507215%
P/E Ratio15.1231.4148%
Revenue550M605M91%
Total Cash771M514M150%
Total Debt210M29.2M719%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HCI vs RMBS: Fundamental Ratings
HCI
RMBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6110
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3833
SMR RATING
1..100
4046
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4547
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1410
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMBS's Valuation (72) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as HCI (86) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that RMBS’s stock grew similarly to HCI’s over the last 12 months.

RMBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as HCI (38) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that RMBS’s stock grew similarly to HCI’s over the last 12 months.

HCI's SMR Rating (40) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as RMBS (46) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that HCI’s stock grew similarly to RMBS’s over the last 12 months.

HCI's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as RMBS (47) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that HCI’s stock grew similarly to RMBS’s over the last 12 months.

RMBS's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as HCI (14) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that RMBS’s stock grew similarly to HCI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HCIRMBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JDCRX44.190.37
+0.84%
Janus Henderson Forty R
PBFDX32.230.21
+0.66%
Payson Total Return
ECTMX16.33N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Dividend Builder C
FSAVX56.25N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Automotive Port
TADAX28.56N/A
N/A
Transamerica US Growth A

RMBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBS has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RMBS jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMBS
1D Price
Change %
RMBS100%
+1.04%
LRCX - RMBS
79%
Closely correlated
+1.24%
KLIC - RMBS
78%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
AMKR - RMBS
77%
Closely correlated
+0.50%
KLAC - RMBS
77%
Closely correlated
+0.74%
VECO - RMBS
76%
Closely correlated
N/A
More