Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HCKAX vs RLBGX
HCKAX vs RLBGX Comparison
Open Charts HCKAX vs RLBGX
Hartford Checks and Balances A
Price$10.33
Change+$0.04 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.36B
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$36.93
Change+$0.10 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets251.77B
HCKAX vs RLBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCKAX vs. RLBGX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCKAX is a Hold and RLBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. HCKAX (1.36B). HCKAX pays higher dividends than RLBGX: HCKAX (2.98) vs RLBGX (2.15). HCKAX was incepted earlier than RLBGX: HCKAX (18 years) vs RLBGX (16 years). HCKAX (0.92) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). RLBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. HCKAX (7.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCKAX: RLBGX (250) vs HCKAX (2000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.44 vs. HCKAX (4.02). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 41.00 vs. HCKAX (22.23).
| HCKAX | RLBGX | HCKAX / RLBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.25 | 368% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.25 | 368% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.635 | 8.347 | 44% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.36B | 252B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.98 | 2.15 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.02 | 7.44 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.59 | 37.32 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.23 | 41.00 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.62 | 65.78 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement