Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HCMDX vs RGACX
HCMDX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts HCMDX vs RGACX
HCM Tactical Growth Investor
Price$25.91
Change+$0.37 (+1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.67B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$75.84
Change+$0.73 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.87B
HCMDX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCMDX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMDX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 305B vs. HCMDX (1.68B). RGACX pays higher dividends than HCMDX: RGACX (0.08) vs HCMDX (0.00). HCMDX was incepted earlier than RGACX: HCMDX (11 years) vs RGACX (23 years). HCMDX (2.77) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). HCMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 188.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMDX: RGACX (250) vs HCMDX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.77 vs. HCMDX (-5.02). HCMDX return over 5 years is better than : 63.72 vs. RGACX (42.86).
| HCMDX | RGACX | HCMDX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.77 | 0.94 | 295% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.77 | 0.94 | 295% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.924 | 5.348 | -129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.68B | 305B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.02 | 8.77 | -57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.62 | 36.12 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.72 | 42.86 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.55 | 71.82 | 222% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement