Ad is loading...
HCMDX vs RGACX
HCMDX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts HCMDX vs RGACX
HCM Tactical Growth Investor
Price$22.22
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.47B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$63.95
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.27B
HCMDX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCMDX vs. RGACX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMDX is a Hold and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. HCMDX (1.47B). RGACX pays higher dividends than HCMDX: RGACX (0.09) vs HCMDX (0.00). HCMDX was incepted earlier than RGACX: HCMDX (11 years) vs RGACX (23 years). HCMDX (2.77) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). HCMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 188.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMDX: RGACX (250) vs HCMDX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.38 vs. HCMDX (-7.46). HCMDX return over 5 years is better than : 64.59 vs. RGACX (34.93).
| HCMDX | RGACX | HCMDX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.77 | 0.94 | 295% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.77 | 0.94 | 295% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -19.023 | -11.168 | 170% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.47B | 261B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.09 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.46 | -3.38 | 220% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.42 | 4.13 | -59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.59 | 34.93 | 185% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.09 | 44.82 | 275% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...