Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HCMDX vs RGACX
HCMDX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts HCMDX vs RGACX
HCM Tactical Growth Investor
Price$27.95
Change+$0.42 (+1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.78B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$79.90
Change+$0.78 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets319.78B
HCMDX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCMDX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMDX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 320B vs. HCMDX (1.78B). RGACX pays higher dividends than HCMDX: RGACX (0.07) vs HCMDX (0.00). HCMDX was incepted earlier than RGACX: HCMDX (11 years) vs RGACX (23 years). HCMDX (2.77) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). HCMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 188.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMDX: RGACX (250) vs HCMDX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.28 vs. HCMDX (-5.72). HCMDX return over 5 years is better than : 71.31 vs. RGACX (47.06).
| HCMDX | RGACX | HCMDX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.77 | 0.94 | 295% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.77 | 0.94 | 295% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.328 | 10.988 | 3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.78B | 320B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.72 | 10.28 | -56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.86 | 58.08 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.31 | 47.06 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 182.36 | 82.67 | 221% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement